Anonymous ID: df2f9a Aug. 24, 2020, 12:54 p.m. No.10404488   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>10404361

>Bullshit.NOT Notable

>

>Jew Blame Shifting to China.

>

>OY VEY IT'S NOT ISRAEL!

>

>OY VEY IT'S NOT MOSSAD!

 

Interesting…didn't see any of those words used in that post here's a refresher:

 

>>10404324

 

KEY POINTS OF ATTACK

 

1) Mail in voting is China's main attack vector for rigging Americas election

 

2) Polls are being skewed to legitimize illegal ballot counts

 

3) Blaming the post office is their current fallback/cover of their insidious plans

 

4) HCQ is beyond a shadow of a doubt, the safest, cheapest, & most effective CURE for ChinaVirus we know of.

 

Overview of the Postmaster General's testimony

 

Our enemy is, mirroring their attacks on Barr, trying to smear the Credibility of DeJoy.

 

They are, mirroring their attacks on Barr, trying to paint DeJoy with "Blind loyalty to Trump".

 

The are, mirroring the supreme journalistic standards of CNN, citing "One source is telling me something sad that supports my narrative and you should feel guilty"

 

Questioning someone who oversees the entire organization about ground-level details is fuel for finding "You don't knows"

 

It's blanket fodder for seeding the belief that he's not qualified.

 

Weak as fuck~

Anonymous ID: df2f9a Aug. 24, 2020, 1:07 p.m. No.10404600   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4718 >>4887 >>5020

Postmaster general clashes with House Democrats over mail delays

 

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy told a House oversight panel that the mail delays following new efficiency reforms will be resolved quickly and clashed with Democrats who accused him of working with President Trump to thwart the Nov. 3 election. “Transitions don’t always go smoothly. We should have cleared it up quicker,” DeJoy, a Trump appointee and prominent GOP donor, told the House Oversight and Reform Committee on Monday. “We have the focus on it now, and it should recover quite rapidly going forward.” Democrats accuse DeJoy of removing mail sorting machines and purposely slowing mail delivery to benefit Trump ahead of the November election. Trump opposes mass mail-in balloting, which many states are using due to the coronavirus pandemic. He and others argue that it leaves the election vulnerable to fraud and other significant problems. DeJoy clashed with Democrats over their accusations, arguing that the only reform he put in place was an order to move the Postal Service’s 40,000 trucks on time.

 

“What the heck are you doing?” Rep. Stephen Lynch, a Massachusetts Democrat, demanded at one point. Lynch asked DeJoy if he would reinstate the postal sorting machines that he removed this year under a long-planned realignment of the post office that began long before DeJoy’s June 16 arrival. “No, I will not,” DeJoy responded to Lynch during the testy exchange. "You're getting a berating up here," Rep. Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican said, apologizing to DeJoy regarding the treatment. DeJoy acknowledged the effort to move trucks on time contributed to unanticipated delays. Trucks in some cases are leaving partly filled or empty, Democrats reported. DeJoy said he’s working to fix the delays but is not cutting overtime or making any other changes in an effort to thwart mail delivery or hurt the mail-in balloting process. DeJoy said the effort to move trucks on time was not meant to lead to trucks leaving without mail and packages. “The rest of your accusations are actually outrageous,” he said to Lynch.

 

This is the second hearing in a week for DeJoy. He appeared before a Senate oversight panel on Friday. DeJoy repeated much of his testimony from Friday, including assurances that the Postal Service will be able to handle mail-in ballots ahead of the election. Trump appointed DeJoy to reform the Postal Service. DeJoy told the panel he's working on changes to both improve and expand service and reduce waste. Democrats, who control the majority on the House panel, suggested that DeJoy is breaking the law by slowing mail in a way that could influence the Nov. 3 election. Rep. Jim Cooper, a Tennessee Democrat, told DeJoy it’s a felony to tamper with the mail. He compared DeJoy to Roger Stone, a former associate of Trump’s whose prison sentence for lying to Congress was commuted by the president. “Previous postmasters general have been punished for much smaller conflicts of interest than yours,” Cooper said, noting DeJoy is a prominent donor to the GOP. "Are your mail delays implicit campaign contributions? Is your backup plan to be pardoned like Roger Stone?” DeJoy responded: “Pitiful. Not worth a comment.”

 

The House convened for an emergency session Saturday and passed a bill that would provide $25 billion to the financially troubled postal agency, which is on track to lose $9 billion this year and is on a financially unsustainable path, a government oversight report found. The measure would also force DeJoy to reverse any realignment and block any new changes. DeJoy told the panel that the Postal Service has enough money to keep operating until mid-2021.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/postmaster-general-clashes-with-house-democrats-over-mail-delays

Anonymous ID: df2f9a Aug. 24, 2020, 1:23 p.m. No.10404758   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4779 >>4887 >>5020

New York attorney general files legal action against Trump Organization in investigation of company finances

 

New York Attorney General Letitia James is investigating the Trump Organization to determine whether it inflated the value of its assets to mislead lenders. A Monday filing from the Democrat asked a state court to order the company and the president's son Eric Trump, the executive vice president of the business, to cooperate with subpoenas issued and provide financial documents as part of the state's investigation. "OAG is currently investigating whether the Trump Organization and Donald J. Trump (Mr. Trump) improperly inflated the value of Mr. Trump’s assets on annual financial statements in order to secure loans and obtain economic and tax benefits. One particular focus of this inquiry, as relevant here, is whether the Trump Organization and its agents improperly inflated, or caused to be improperly inflated, the value of the Seven Springs Estate," the court filing said, adding that the attorney general's office has not "concluded its investigation and has not reached a determination regarding whether the facts identified to date establish violations of law."

 

The civil investigation into the company began after Michael Cohen, a longtime personal lawyer to President Trump, testified before Congress in early 2019 that his former boss's financial statements, spanning from 2011 to 2013, "inflated the values of Mr. Trump’s assets to obtain favorable terms for loans and insurance coverage, while also deflating the value of other assets to reduce real estate taxes," the filing said. "Following that testimony, OAG began an investigation and determined that the financial statements were, in fact, provided to financial institutions."

 

Eric Trump has "no plausible basis to defy a lawful subpoena" as part of the investigation, the filing argued. The president's son was scheduled to be interviewed by state authorities in July of this year, but the documents said his lawyers later canceled that interview. “We cannot allow the requested interview to go forward … pursuant to those rights afforded to every individual under the Constitution," Eric Trump's lawyers argued, according to the filing. In response to the filing, Eric Trump accused James of exercising the "highest level of prosecutorial misconduct," attaching a video of the state attorney general in which she encouraged others to vote against the president and indicated plans to "definitely sue" him. "We're going to be a real pain in the ass. He's going to know my name personally," James said in the video that Trump tweeted out. In early August, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office also issued a court filing that appears to show that it is investigating potential bank and insurance fraud in the Trump Organization. Prosecutors did not explicitly identify the focus of their investigation, but they did say that "undisputed" news reports about the organization's business conduct provide a legitimate basis for their subpoena seeking the president's financial records. Those reports claim that Trump inflated his net worth and the values of his properties to lenders and insurers. The president's legal team asserts that he did nothing wrong.

 

State prosecutors subpoenaed Deutsche Bank, a creditor for Trump's properties as a private citizen, last year as part of their criminal investigation into the president's business practices, according to a report from the New York Times. Authorities reportedly sought to obtain all documents and records Trump submitted to the bank. Over the course of several months, the bank provided District Attorney Cyrus Vance's office with detailed financial statements and materials the president provided in order to obtain loans. Sources reportedly said the prosecutor's investigation is still in its early stages. In July, the Supreme Court ruled that the president must allow the state of New York to examine his financial records as part of a grand jury criminal investigation. The case, Trump v. Vance, pertains to the district attorney for New York County asking for eight years' worth of Trump's personal tax returns in connection with a grand jury investigation. The documents are material for which the president may not claim executive privilege.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/new-york-attorney-general-files-legal-action-against-trump-organization-in-investigation-of-company-finances

 

Doc 11 Memorandum of Law

https://www.scribd.com/document/473499860/Doc-11-Memorandum-of-Law#from_embed

Anonymous ID: df2f9a Aug. 24, 2020, 1:52 p.m. No.10405058   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>10405002

>>10405002

>There is no constitutional duty or obligation to say ANYTHING about Q.

>

>You're just smearing those good lawyers who choose to stay silent about it.

 

Who said it was about Q??? This is in general there is moar than JUST Q being silenced! Refresher:

>>10404893

>This is such a RARE occurrence among Attorney's! Where are the rest >of them, why aren't they calling out those who do NOT stand for >everyone's Constitutional Rights! They take the oath to uphold the Constitution