"Do you believe in coincidences?"
Honestly, Q? Less and less. Auth B19-2 and somehow that translates into 2 B-1 lancer bombers firing a total of 19 missiles? Starting to feel like facts are being stretched to fit the narrative. I think it's time for you to make a clear prediction. Past needs to prove the future. Because with "future proves past"… you can fit anything into the past. Everything becomes a coincidence at that point and no matter what happens, however horrible it may be, everything "fits". It's essentially confirmation bias. And I (and I'm sure I'm not alone), would like to eliminate confirmation bias as a factor. Prove to us, one single date with a clear cut predictive event. Something innocuous. Like when is the Facebook and Twitter info being dropped? You said "drop after testimony". But you never stated what is being dropped. And you certainly didn't give a date/timeline. But anons have generally accepted that it has to do with Facebook & Twitter. But after the Syria bombing, I'm looking at this and wondering, it's too vague. It could be anything. It's specific enough to hang onto with hope but vague enough that any kind of "drop event" would fit into the narrative. That's not coincidence, that's not future proving past. That's just playing on confirmation bias. Choose something that won't hurt or derail the plan. Narrow it down for us, eliminate our confirmation bias. Prove the future with a clear, non-vague prediction.