real men of action don't go on a chat board and pretend to be bad-ass by encouraging vigillantism.

that is an inorganic push to make this board seem as if there is a violence aspect, however, it's a free speach research board and violence is never considered valid as a purpose here.

the bot or shill banter is inorganic because brave and active people do not boast about miltancy or the need to defend themselves in a public way as if anyone who doesn't agree is not worthy (of?).

my point: the push to smear the board goes on even with the feckless democratic spokes puppets of the left putting out a resolution codeming in a singular tense 'the QAaon' as if there is some group with that name.

maybe they will usurp the name can call it the QAnon Brotherhood and have color revolutions in all the states ? ? ?

they wish.

they tried that with a different group in the Medeterrain basin, see how that worked out for them

there can be no consensus on this board.

there is no way to know the opinions of the users in any reliable way.

people will take opposing opinions just to do an exchange of ideas.

our posts aren't blood vows.

we are anon.

we don't know who each other are.

we can't be a conspiracy.

the folks in congress who pass resolutions condemning 'the QAnon' can't even know us, so how can they condemn us.

if you don't like a post or a poster, then that, alone, is all you can say is you don't like.

It's like saying someone put a classified advertisment in a newspaper that you don't like, so now eveyrone who ever put an ad there is now part of a conspiracy.

that's insane.

they know that it is cray cray to think that it would be normal to say that all users of a chat board are . . . part of a conspiracy when it's an open room architecture!

we are like people who toss coins in a fountain, each coin of our own mintage (or copypasta posts, they put in duplicate coins)

or fame fags, so pretty and handsome, they put in coins with their faces on them (and it's a problem becuase we grow to care (bleckkk).)

any way you can't shut us up. you can pass a resolution and we will say you have no brain (there is no we that will actually say that, there can be no consensus on a board with this method of 'filling' at 751 posts.

>>10425277

"don't come back" he says.

what are you going to do, post a Tom Petty video?

>>10425308

self defense isn't the same as vigilantism.

vigilantism is extrajudicial application of false-Justice, that does not go through process.

what you are doing sounds like 'vigilant neighborhood watch' which is what we have police for, and security services.

and also locals now to in places where the situation has been let to devolve by malefescience of local governance.

everyone has a right to self defense.

>>10425646

if you are part of the deal they write the check and say 'see you on the holidays'

>>10425670

you are a democrat?

>>10425688

you write in all caps.

so you have an audit of who gets payouts from Insurance and what their political affiliation is?

becuase I tell you this by observation only but I'd love to see an audit of it.

maybe you can find one and post it.

>>10425775

how so?

explain why?

the method is clear, and has been used for a long time.

the most sensitive and protected groups are chosen.

these are people who have positions of effecting change.

they are then psyppped with hate.

and then that same hate, in a similar form, is robo-spammed to any comm or chat or newprint place to allow for the ones who do it to say, to dupes in the targetted group ' see, here is where it is too'

and don't pepole all know it's all a con? of course they do. but that doesn't stop the con from continuing with the methods that marxists always use: gaslighting and lying.

well that's it, problem solved. The hate is fake.

the attempt to censor those who post here is not fake.