There Can Be No Deals
Are you so stupid that you believe someone with the highest security clearance in Military Intelligence, who swore the oath of allegiance, and whointends to uphold that oathwould actually tell you, in public, something that is classified?
Did you really believe that somebody working for Donald J. Trump, author of The Art Of The Deal would actually reveal, in public, something about the government's intention in dealing with an adversary?
You're some special kind of stupid, aren't you?
Everything that Q wrote is a LIE or is GARBAGE
It is the only way.
Q made these drops to encourage people to stand up and think for themselves
To do their own research.
Every drop shines a laser on some aspect of Cabal crime and corruption.
NO DEALS.
Could that be an anagram AND LOSE? Maybe.
Could it be a reminder that a game is being played? Maybe.
Could it tell us the type of game afoot, like a card game where on some moves, you can ask for cards to be dealt? Maybe.
But one thing you can be sure of.
It reveals no classified information that is not already in the public domain.
And it says nothing that would criminals an edge in planning their next move.
Experimental Blood Test Detects Cancer up to Four Years before Symptoms Appear
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/experimental-blood-test-detects-cancer-up-to-four-years-before-symptoms-appear/
For years scientists have sought to create the ultimate cancer-screening test—one that can reliably detect a malignancy early, before tumor cells spread and when treatments are more effective. A new method reported today in Nature Communications brings researchers a step closer to that goal. By using a blood test, the international team was able to diagnose cancer long before symptoms appeared in nearly all the people it tested who went on to develop cancer.
“What we showed is: up to four years before these people walk into the hospital, there are already signatures in their blood that show they have cancer,” says Kun Zhang, a bioengineer at the University of California, San Diego, and a co-author of the study. “That’s never been done before.”
Past efforts to develop blood tests for cancer typically involved researchers collecting blood samples from people already diagnosed with the disease. They would then see if they could accurately detect malignant cells in those samples, usually by looking at genetic mutations, DNA methylation (chemical alterations to DNA) or specific blood proteins. “The best you can prove is whether your method is as good at detecting cancer as existing methods,” Zhang says. “You can never prove it’s better.”