>>1042410 (past bread)

i believe you miss the point. myself and many of the people i talked to since 2011 are pretty sure (should be obvious) that not assad put the chemical warfare excesses onto his people, but other forces.

this should be obvious, because these gas encounters always happen shortly after foreign military pulls out of the syrian war, and why would assad be so stupid and react with new gas encounters right after foreign forces leave his country?

assad is retarded and wants foreigners back in syria that want him dead/replaced?

once you understand it just cannot be assad that does all the gas strikes to his people, you must understand that there is a force embedded in syria that does these chemical attacks over and over again.

now… could trump just throw missiles at the real enemy in syria, even if he knows who it is? (cia/mossad/hisbollah/etc?). could he go public with this? the answer is no. msm all over the world would blame him as a nutty conspiracy theorist warmonger that must be impeached because he cannot handle the power he has as an american president.

which buildings were destroyed in syria? was it chemical warfare production units?

do msm-zombies think thats bad for assad?

could msm judge trump for this strike within their narrative?

is it really bad for assad?

who is the real target of the strikes?

is it the people that are guilty for the chemical warfare attacks in the past?