Anonymous ID: 8ebd92 Aug. 27, 2020, 2:26 p.m. No.10442327   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2394

>>10442220

Has anyone ever performed an independent trawl of Pacer to establish that the data is materially correct? Accumulating numbers of document/case sealings for a protracted period of time makes little sense in the context of the prosecutorial-judicial process.

Anonymous ID: 8ebd92 Aug. 27, 2020, 2:39 p.m. No.10442500   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10442394

I question the data presented here and elsewhere. We don’t know who compiled it, how they went about it, whether the selection criteria within Pacer are appropriate, or whether the information is even sourced from Pacer. Add in statutes of limitations applying to underlying crimes and the 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial and the whole edifice looks to totter towards collapse.