>Your answer means you are maintaining your stance of insinuating generalities. There is no evidence to support such contentions and as such, you are incorrect with your assertion.
If you don't know what was hit and why perhaps you should spend more time ingesting and digesting the information on these boards before you start spouting off generalities.
Your response means that you fail to grasp the locus of said anon’s insinuations, as it were. The erroneous assumption by pure bred elite, such as yourself, is the absence of empirical evidence foregoes the validity of any hypotheses rendered by an individual. The arrogant nature of the political and military power structure’s leaders is there is some excuse, (for the greater good) to consistently misinform and attempt to baffle the public with bullshit. These phenomena began shortly after the second world war and continues in its entirety to this very day. Ergo, even as an academic elite, having an obviously trained mind and strong grasp of vernacular wizardry at your disposal; you are also in possession of little more than hypotheses and assertions that cannot be proven beyond a doubt.