The original comment was, “>>1044345
same for Godlike Productions
total cabal operation”
The response was appropriate given that specific text.
If you are now trying to change it to include non-specific sources, that might be a different situation, but still one that would require verifiable proof, not the standard MSM tactic of mysterious sources.
So then you are admitting that what you are posting is nothing more than a collection of words with nothing solid behind them.
Hence, your unsubstantiated ramblings deserve no more than any others, perhaps less because you admit they are unsubstantiated.
Obviously you are not educated more aware of the rules of debate, Proof, logic and the fallacies that you use.
You tried to equate a tangible object with your unsubstantiated, hollow words. That is not logical nor relevant.
And when you realized that you were not able to measure up, your fall back position was to select a fallacy, ad hominem.
Learn.