Anonymous ID: 9c5e83 Aug. 28, 2020, 9:17 a.m. No.10452402   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2439 >>2443

>>10452065

breddy guud anon

i agree with others, the Q clock has never been proven to be reliable. we tolerated it in the beginning because it made people re-read the crumbs… which every anon should be doing anyway.

a lot of times when people present a 'decode' of the Q clock, its an exercise in schizo-land.

see Q post #1114 for an accurate description of the drops and how 'future proves past' works.

o7