>>1045509 (prev bread)
Lol. I gave you the answer and the historical context of why it isn't.
If you can't comprehend that, then you shouldn't be here.
How can something that came first, be "another way of saying"
something that came afterwards, especially when the two are different?
If you asked whether they were the same, which is what I now think you
meant, I would have known you were retarded and ignored you.