dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: b283e2 Aug. 28, 2020, 10:17 p.m. No.10459436 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>9500 >>9580

GREAT NEWS!

Poll: John James Takes Lead in Michigan Senate Race

According to a new Trafalgar Group poll, Republican challenger John James has taken the lead over incumbent Sen. Gary Peters (D) in the key battleground state of Michigan.

The survey, which was conducted during the Democratic National Convention, and before the Republican National Convention, showed James with 48.1 percent support, compared to 46.6 percent for Peters. Other candidates have the support of 2.1 percent of respondents, while 3.2 percent were undecided

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/08/28/poll-john-james-takes-lead-in-michigan-senate-race/

>>10459442

>GREAT NEWS!

MORE GREAT NEWS!

Judge Allows Sarah Palin’s Defamation Lawsuit Against New York Times to Proceed

U.S. Judge Jed S. Rakoff, a Bill Clinton appointee, allowed Sarah Palin’s defamation lawsuit against the New York Times to proceed, saying that a jury should decide whether editorial page editor James Bennet acted with “actual malice” in writing that Palin was responsible for “political incitement” that led to the mass shooting in Tuscon, Arizona, in January 2011.

The Times published the editorial in the wake of a June 2017 mass shooting by a deranged leftist who targeted Republican members of Congress at their baseball practice. The Tuscon shooter was mentally disturbed; accusations against Palin had long since been disproved.

The Times issued a correction, but Palin sued. Rakoff dismissed the lawsuit, but it was reinstated by the Second Circuit. (Ironically, Bennet recently resigned as editorial page editor under pressure from “woke” reporters.)

In his ruling Friday, Rakoff rejected efforts by Palin’s legal team to argue that the tough “actual malice” standard for public figures should not apply, or that the Times was liable, regardless of intent, if there was a possibility readers could make a defamatory intepretation.

But he said a jury ought to decide whether the Times, through Bennet, acted with actual malice:

[T]aken in the light most favorable to plaintiff [Palin], the evidence shows Bennet came up with an angle for the Editorial, ignored the articles brought to his attention that were inconsistent with his angle, disregarded the results … [of] research that he commissioned, and ultimately made the point he set out to make in reckless disregard of the truth[.]

There was also evidence to the contrary, he said — that Bennet had drawn an “innocent inference” — but the question was one for the jury to decide, according to the “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard laid down in New York Times v. Sullivan.

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2020/08/28/judge-allows-sarah-palins-defamation-lawsuit-against-new-york-times-to-proceed/

Fusion GPS Leader Bragged in 2019 Book About Planting False Attacks Against Devin Nunes in Local Newspaperhttps://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/08/28/fusion-gps-leader-bragged-in-2019-book-about-planting-false-attacks-against-devin-nunes-in-local-newspaper/

Kyle Rittenhouse Lawyers: He Is No Racist; Exercised Right to Self-Defensehttps://www.breitbart.com/crime/2020/08/28/kyle-rittenhouse-lawyers-he-is-no-racist-exercised-right-to-self-defense/