>>10460153 pb
so they claim
and i guess the dude knew all about 911 either?
the crazy religious suicide bombers did it?
kkekkkekkkekek
and he didn't know that they are all trying to kill POTUS
the crazy stuff we're expected to believe.
oh dude has GREAT credentials. Sure he does.
and i guess the dude knew all about 911 also?
BTW isn't Mueller implicated in the 911 plot on the top level?
sure
were the RUSSIANS altering the google algo to favor HRC?
https://synckronicles.net/viewtopic.php?p=61#p61
>10460249
>https://twitter.com/RichHiggins_DC/status/1299434456198115329
NOTABLE BAKER
IMPORTANT Warning from "Fmr Strat Plans at NSC, Political Warfare" as to structure of color revolution and what to do to counter
done to me.
happens
they take shit out.
if they don't like it.
it's an honor system
how could we stop it?
by baking ourselves?
and just putting it back in?
>>>10460237 (You)
>
>>should have been labeled 'rumor'
>
>well, if it was that substanceless, wouldn't be worth notabling - theories ok, rumors not really
NYTIMES which is deemed credible does much worse
labels rumors as news
Without the label "rumor" we are no better?
keep the info flowing but label properly
not at all
no problem with a rumor as long as labeled as such
let the reader decide
<
it's less about his id than the info
if people like to read him, do it; so what?
people read Benjamin Fulford too.
This is how i always figure it. if i know xyz about what the gov is doing, back to carnivore in the '90's and then umbrella; and all i am is a civilian who does open source on the Internets
how am i supposed to believe that someone in the nsa knows less than i do?
not plausible
yah, that's how you know they are hang outs when they "go public"
they refrain from mentioning things which are obvious to a public researcher but which are still unknown to most of the public.
that's how you know they are players and less than candid.
we don't need him or his credientials to tell us that
sorry.
is that all?
is that he gives. things we already know by other means?
also, is that how he gets the cred to lead the public farther down a rosy path? give them info they could figure out themselves
but from a bona fide
"reputable" source
fuck off
like said before
binney endorsing E means nothing.
and why is this being pushed?
my theory.
now that Q researchers are more prominent they need a simulation
Also didn't E denounce Q?
they have much worse trouble there? no bill of rights.
that's because you're already sold to MARX?
also a jewish person likely wouldn't want you.
stop talking about groups as though they were individuals, it's illogical bigotry.
yea and if you try to open up old windows from last week you get an error , like a 401