>>10461008

Here's a story I was told by a Cisco network engineer. They had lunch with one of the really senior engineers. Everyone took out their phone and plonked it on the table, to show off their hardware. Everyone … except the senior engineer. Everyone else was puzzled, and someone eventually asked – what phone have you got?

And this guy pulled aside the hair on one side of his head, and showed them the scar from a brain tumor operation. Exactly where he held the phone, he said, and he's never used a mobile phone since. This was told to me by "Dave", a heavy Christian and a Brazilian ju-jitsu expert. And a bona fide Cisco man. I don't think he made the story up.

Lennart Hardell found a 400% increase in glioblastomas in young people who were early adopters of mobile phones. Check it out. Leif Salford found damage to the blood-brain barrier after two minutes of low-level radiation. It was the lowest levels that opened the barrier the most, allowing toxins into the brain. He was warning of "teen dementia" from 2003.

There are literally dozens of studies showing severe damage to sperm and reduced sperm count from low-level microwaves.

5G is going to include 60 GHz radiation, tuned to be absorbed by oxygen, so that the frequencies can be reused nearby. Irradiating you at close range with radiation precisely tuned to the frequency of oxygen … not smart. No testing – now that's smart, you don't want to health-test THIS stuff.

Facebook has already rolled out 60 GHz urban networks – see Terragraph. The Google Pixel 4 phone features a 60 GHz radar that tracks your every movement, every twitch of your fingers, for a radius of 15 yards around your phone. This is military-grade directed energy weapons technology, this radar will track you and keep you right in its hottest spot.

If you really think 5G is safe, then test it and prove it.

>>10461250

Well, all you provided was the anecdotal evidence that you were a Cisco engineer and there was no problem. So I provided another Cisco anecdote.

"What kind of test" – how about any serious assessment of the health risks? Which would require trials lasting at least a couple of years? There are millimetre-wave studies showing all kinds of alarming effects, especially in the skin. The very fact that you say there's no problem and we should just enjoy the ride, is proof that you're completely unaware of the literature in this field.

Check out Bristol University: 5G testbed since 2017. Fifteen students have committed suicide there in the last three years, happy people who inexplicably take their own lives. I predicted suicides with 5G here long ago. "Enjoy the ride."

However, it's rare indeed to get any response from industry these days, even here, they hide behind their pals in the media. There has never been a serious story in a MSM newspaper anywhere in the world about this issue. The best article I've seen was in GQ magazine back in 2009.

Sorry, dude, but you are really proving my point. There's a problem, and industry and government and the media deny it. And it's even denied here, which is funny, this is supposed to be the deep inquiry, follow your nose, where we go one board. Or did I get that wrong somewhere.

>>10461262

And will also be connected to your mobile phone, of course. Elon Musk:

“I should say that’s kind of an important thing, because this would connect to your phone, and so the application would be on your phone, and the Link communicating, by essentially Bluetooth low energy to the device in your head.”

If you don't understand how absolutely fucking insane this is, then maybe you deserve a chip in your numb skull.

>>10461532

I want to know when we're going to see microwave weapons deployed against rioters, it must be soon. See around 26:55 in this video, if you've never seen this "non-lethal" weaponry in action.