>>10467277 I am very interested in the ballistics of the wound the diminutive pedo took in the back. It bled so little the onlookers thought the grazing head wound required all the attention.
$5 says he was hit there by someone shooting at Kyle.
It's a Saturday Night Shift. Let's have some fun, we deserve it… let's tear some shit UP!
>>10467463 Cool! I'll throw in free beer, if you're right.
Been a shooter (turned gunsmith) for over half a century, and still can't figure out how a high velocity round dumped enough energy to shatter a pelvis, without leaving a huge messy entrance wound (especially at that range). That is more common with slower, heavier stuff, like a larger pistol bullet.
>>10467552 Yup… neat tidy entrance, full dump within inches.
>>10467570 Also quite possible.
>>10467613 Actually the energy dump would begin sooner with a high velocity round (it malforms on contact (like elbow boy… make a mess that's hard to ignore) Slower rounds take longer to blossom.
Appreciate your input… especially your derision, for someone who has studied ballistics/loaded their own longer than you have been alive.
Reading comprehension is the key here.