Anonymous ID: 769eae Aug. 30, 2020, 11:06 a.m. No.10473560   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3685

>>10473407 lb

>They wanted to call Pepe an egregore - which may be so - but I drew the line at using that term when speaking to normies

Respectfully, no, I said Kek was chan & our egregore.

Kek is NOT satire, whether you want to use the term egregore or not, it is applicable and true: a group thoughtform, arising from a collective group of people.

That encapsulates Kek perfectly and not really too difficult to grasp, even for a normie. If they've come far enough to look into Q and read your excellent FAQ, they will understand that concept, and if not immediately, they can look into it.

 

Pepe, if you remember, I suggested is: a cartoon frog with endless permutations used as a reaction image on imageboards.

Anonymous ID: 769eae Aug. 30, 2020, 11:23 a.m. No.10473685   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3734

>>10473466

Ok, a little is here:

>>10473560

But here is some verbiage directly:

 

Kek, Kuk or Keku was a god in ancient Egypt, a primordial deity symbolizing twilight, obscurity and chaos which serves as chan and anons' egregore (a group thoughtform from a collective) and exemplifies the existence and reality of "meme magic."

 

Pepe: a cartoon frog with endless creative permutations used a reaction image on imagesboards/social media

 

You are awesome :)

Anonymous ID: 769eae Aug. 30, 2020, 11:37 a.m. No.10473771   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3803

>>10473734

NO ONE said anything about "worshipping" anyone or anything. That is the history of Kek on the chans, regardless of your or my religious inclinations, it is historically accurate. No one actually worships Kek. Meme magic is intrinsically tied to Kek as the egregore of the chans, our memes are one of the reasons Q came to us - to excise out Kek and the historical role, connection to "meme magic" would be a disservice.

 

A group thoughtform is not a competition to which ever religion someone is.

 

This is really frustrating, tbh.

Anonymous ID: 769eae Aug. 30, 2020, 11:46 a.m. No.10473846   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3874 >>3954

>>10473803

>Mentioning Kek as an Egyptian 'god' is my issue. I cannot do that. It WAS considered a god by the Egyptians.

Osiris was also an Egyptian god, mentioning that does not mean it is real, nor does it serve to replace God of Christianity.

"Kek was considered an Egyptian god" does not mean that YOU consider Kek to be God.

See the difference?

Anonymous ID: 769eae Aug. 30, 2020, 11:56 a.m. No.10473931   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3948 >>3970

>>10473874

I'm not criticizing your personally, your writing, your work or you own beliefs. I appreciate what you have done for us all this time, what you do now here and /there/ and you, personally. I am a stickler for accuracy, as you know well :)

And you are still awesome and I still love you (no homo)

Anonymous ID: 769eae Aug. 30, 2020, 12:07 p.m. No.10474028   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4190

>>10473954

>your faith is being tested

Gross mischaracterization.

Typing out "Hindus consider Shiva a god" does not in any way convey the status (faith or lack of) person typing it; it is simply conveying a fact. Hindus DO think that, but that doesn't mean the person typing it agrees. Nor does typing that increase or decrease the typist's faith in their own religion.

Anonymous ID: 769eae Aug. 30, 2020, 12:11 p.m. No.10474048   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4103

>>10473970

Meme magic IS absolutely real, even though I am at a loss to explain it. I don't think "magic" like conventional (people spouting off in Latin or waving sticks around in the air) but I can't think of another word to describe it. It's elusive and mysterious and inexpiable, so I guess it's a good term to use.

Even NATO knows it's real!

 

>I think we are heading into a Very. VERY! Interesting. Week!

I do, too, though I have no idea what to expectโ€ฆ