>>Warroom anon
>KYS
>>(the genesis one from Europe, not Endchan, who is a fucking moron)
>ooops never mind
No no you had it right.
So all you have to do to have deniability is respond to a post of your own and put (lb) in front of it eh?
NOT notable
>Genesis is a social media warrior hero.
Fuck off, Anon is. Icould give a shit about this name you are pushing so hard.
>>Genesis is a social media warrior hero.
>Absolutely right! She kicks ass and takes names, so glad to be part of the team!
We dont recognize name fags here. Go jerk yourself in your own room.
>They work on social media using various names.
Dont give a shit. Anons are here, not your faggy names. Fuck right off.
>Operational reports from meme Ops are ABSOLUTELY notable. Anons need to know what's working and what's not.
Your gay and fake namefags are not notable in the slightest. Anons are, YOU are not.
>Dammit Anon you were on a roll too
True story, my bad. Will watch the word crimes video yet again!
>You're an inorganic horse's ass
That is the homeless McDonalds wi-fi stealing fellow from Colorado. Hes impotent dont cha know.
>She does not have or use a name. OG (or Genesis) is not a name, it's just a descriptor to differentiate her from angry gerbil.
Far to late. Already happened and you, ya fag, made sure it did. Fuck off and take the homeless impotent guy with you or im gonna report you to McD's Corporate for you stealing the Wi-Fi.
>So do you not have a name IRL or is that considered 'namefagging' also?
You seem to have trouble with the concept of ANON. Here let me help:
My name does not matter
My sex does not matter
NOTHIGN about me matters outside of thoughts and ideas. Like you having trouble understanding what an ANON is and my suspicions around that fact..
>Your opposition is illogical.
>Is that you, gerbil?
No, really homelss guy in Colorado who imagines himself being some form of Svengali, pack up your You-Haul and piss off.
>So is Q a namefag?
YOU are a name fag. This entire board is set up for him, with him and in cooperation of him. NONE of that is about you no matter how hard you try and divert from the fact. Read the links at the top, its all clearly explained.
>So anons, what's the difference between Ratcliffe sending written reports and informing congress orally? Obviously it's upsetting Nancy and Schitt, but don't see how it stops them from leaking? Can't they or someone im their office leak what they read as easily as what they had heard during an oral briefing?
When it is on paper, it is something that cannot be denied. I had a job once that they demanded that I transport a weapon, even though the State banned any such thing. Told em to put the demand on paper and I would. Never happened and didnt carry the weapon.