why would you say such stuff except that you are a creepy shill?
I come here and read this stuff and realize that some of the posters are these total shill-holes.
let me think? why would you do that?
oh ya, they are retrainted and you don't need to do it anymore.
"never post creepy svengalli posts in the A.M. even when you are a total shill loser" is what you should say.
your ironic crap is crap.
gee, let me think.
ok let's analyze.
first one must see what svengalli bullshit you put in it.
you put in a false aphorism.
a false aphorism sounds 'truthy', but n fact is very bad advice. It apes the form of something that might be true, but in fact that depends on what is being said. In your case you use an aphoristic style of someone who intentionally leads people astray. You give bad advice.
Let's analyize this. the aphorism in question will have three parts. (1) the form of it.
(2) the action
(3) some consequence
so (1) is never (2) unless (3)
in this case (2) : take you knee off an enemies neck
that is the part that makes you a creepy shill.
of course once an officer of solider makes the arrest, there is a time to take the knee off.
and you have to know this.
so you made a false aphorism that is very creepy and bad advice and that is why.
do I need to go on?
the false aphorism is supposedly an ironic joke.
but the false aphorism is often easily misunderstood by young or untrained minds as a direction. And so people imagine some truth to it. But it's an ironic joke. You're supposed to know that it's not what you do, but what you don't do. but the Svengalli knows that people are suggestible and will shit anyway, even though it's not a good idea, because the idea is 'put there' as an insert through songs and music and lyrics not filtered correctly by performers, but made in such a way as to hypnotize people into doing nonsense, or believing nonsense.
so the 'false aphorism' is in the form of a slogan of advertising, as well. You could call it a 'pithy phrase'. It's operational conditioning using operational words of the maniupulatoratti: those who always chime their manipulations constantly.
It's an empty headed thing, often, that people don't realize that they are doing when they repeat such things. Often it seems as though it 'should be true' due to the form of it as if it's directions. but it's just a statement of ironic nonsense meant to either trick or ammuse.
oh, and the people who do this say stuff like "if they aren't smart enough to know it's not true than they deserve what they get."
Flase Aphorism are like taking your lessons from a bad mentor. The False aphoirsm is in the form of a slogan, as used in Marketting and Advertising. But the flase aphorism is usually supremely bad and mocking advice.
the person who speaks in false aphorisms is either playfull doing a bit, as a game to interact and banter in a friendly way, (one who 'shots the shit' like the bantering at a hillside August night bonfire in the mountains with frenz)
or . . . a dangerous svengalli.
people like LRon were masters of getting people to follow along with false banter aphoritic nonsense
back to your misunderstandings again?
the deep state is where ever they are and they don't live in any one place, or gather in a way to be well known.
you're just directing pepole to do this dig for your own purposes and , in fact, have no real idea about the control plane of American Government.
you would be useing a false statement, so why would you want to promote their false aphorisms.
a moral person ought not use false aphorism in adervistements meant to mentor the truth . . .
you would thus need to meme it so you make it clear that you don't really believe the nonses of that statement. the statement is quotes is a bullshit operational phrase of svengalli poison mentors of the left.
expose that, and you have something.
wake them up from their programming by showing them how these false statements are used like a programming langauge by their leaders.
wake them up.
remind them that violence isn't a joke and you shouldn't follow along with the chanting of falsehood because that is violence against the truth.
the statement of 'silence is violence' is a false aphorism that is loudly violent against truth.
anon knows what anon is doing and anon is an adult and if the explanation of what you do doesn't apply to you, thats awesome but a false aphorism was noted in your content and you do not disavow it.
not that you are required to do so, no.
but it is a metric to me as to the quality ofyour post.
and thus I wrote what I did.
if you can't notice what that false aphorism is that's telling me you are a bot or a dolt.
I am guessing bot because why would a dolt be on an international message board.
bot I got ta do my job till the end of the cycle.
discrete 'run once' streams of process have no sense of real-time.
they run in a loop and they are unable to process the real, they can only deal with their 'input', and have no native intuition, or grasp of the truth and falsity of aphoritic dialogs.
not Gert again!!!
all of that is wrong so some of it might be right.
a falsity that says something true, but it's not stated out right.
or not.
the above is an example of speaking in false aphorism but subverting them to make it seem that the speaker is being either poetic, or is having cognitive lapses in their linquistic functioning.
when the svengalli is faced with a parsing out and explaination (a 'splain') about their nonsense they can meet you with further nonsense which is svengallit code to other svengalli-team-operators (players is close to a synonym for this) .
the svengallidgits (the operational players) will signal with their continuance of the operational aphoritic nonsensical conditioning phraseology, of a hyper partisan repetitious nature, to the other svengallidgit.
and they acceptance of this nonsense is a code to them, it seems (that's me saying I'm veering off into sauceless bs).
but when an non svengallidgit questions, and does not accept the nonsense, the operational aphorism repeater will not cotton well (cotton well? do you mean handle with niceness?) to the use of meta-languages (the kind that talks about the phrases and the speaker and how that person presents the communications)
the svengallidgits do not handle with niceness those who question the false aphoritic repetition of hypnotic conditioning. and those who do question such do it with meta languages.
it would be like if I took this post and then made a bit map and then layered comments on top of it.
we can do that in multiple layers, like 'correcting' a paper when paper used to be how class-work would be submitted.
now what the censor does is to claim that right to say 'I am the page corrector and I circle what I dont' like'.
but the truth is that once somoene does that who censors the censors? why do they 'get it right'? and why wouldn't there be one more layer of circling and berating and judging?
and if you let there be one more, there is always one more beyond that.
that is why the commenting and annotating of someone else's work should not be a requirement for published material.
the censors of the control culture would have it that they have final say on the content of all others.
and they would not let you see it so that their 'will be done' pronouncements could be reviewed.
insertion one hit wonder post, what have you contributed lately?
anon seems to be stating thta one has a moral obligation under many fine codes of morality that says 'youdon't just stand by and let bad things happen to other people, you warn them about it.'
the problem with that is that the idea of being that concerned person, the urge of concern, is used to make good people busy-body and fall for rouses.
for example say you are driving in a remote place and you see an old Indian in the high grass and he suddenly catches your eye, an odd behavior for the locals (they do not look into other people's eyes, and they actively avoid eye contact) and then ye clutches his heart and does a dramatic 'collapse' into the grass.
remember you are 50 miles from anyone else, so it seems. It's odd that somoene at noon would be standing there at the end of the 2 mile long dirt road that goes off into some pueblo off over there where you can't see. It's an old man.
He's supposedly alone.
it's tall grass.
it's noontime at the height of the Summer.
would you 'stop and help' or say 'that is a setup, and I would be attacked if I went over to help'?
the answer is 'drive on'
how do you think I'm speaking clearly when the typing drops out or swaps letters, or my mind works so fast I drop words out?
I'm doing analisys of censors and how they operate in a clinical way, you get a draft.
I discuss issues of censorship and metalangauge of discussing other people's ideas and how they present those ideas.
I am an independant mind and I like to educate and explain how poison mentoring happens, but at the same time not give out the details on how to be a sevengallidgit.
and the last thing I do is copiously and playfully make up new words.
if you don't like me then just move along. I don't care.
and as far as 'joy in my life' we don't share our personals. but let me tell you I get great joy from the people who I discover by finding them first here. They often are very wonderful.
and ya, if you thought I am telling you how to be, that's not what I'm doing. I am explaining the svengalli methods without (hopefully) teaching pepole how to be that way.
don knots had a line in a Three's Company episode discussing Doctors.
"They aren't honest. That's why they all wear masks"
kind of hard judging me, aren't you?
two million people peacefully at Sacramento would help your cause. surround their base of power, that's a public park, you have a right to be there. Go take it back
it's like Frauddie is running the wartroam?
do one of your California millions love-in patriots as a constant vigil surrounding the capital building in Sacramento for as long as it takes.
Sacramento Patriot Love in!
don't eat things that form concrete when mixed inside your body.
the anon would most rather have a 'peaceroom' anyway, but that makes it sound to 'love-in Hippy'