HAHAHAHAHA, the D Party has become a low IQ cult of projection shills.
Nice try projecting Satanist.
YOU WILL NOT DIVIDE ME FROM ABRAHAMIC FOLLOWERS.
"I come not to abolish The Law, but to fulfill it" - Jesus/Jeshua
Cope.
Notice that the Satanic division shills only have cartoons, while Anons have real world facts.
That's gotta burn!
(In hell, where they're going, kek)
>So Satan is the keystone.
The TRUTH in REAL form is the keystone, IMO, that INCLUDES, but is not limited to, knowledge of Satanist activity in the real world.
I do not view the thought of Satan as a 'fundamental' of anything other than an 'accidental' contingent division predicated entirely on individual human volition.
>Apply the keystone
Q has made drops suggesting the keystone is something other than the thought of Satan.
What you're typing appears as if you WANT people to start FOLLOWING Satan, and I know that's bad advise.
>This drop implies that the recordings on the island/residence (or wherever those RC CCTV images were from) are in the hands of 17-group, yet the drops tell us to apply the keystone and find it.
Symbology?
>The videos should hold evidence of Satanic ritual, but where are they?
No idea.
SATANISTS think they're SOooo-oo
Important to the 99.9999% of Non-
Satanic Americans.
DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR
If You Wait By The River Long Enough,
The Bodies of Your Enemies SATAN
Will Float By.
SUN PEPE
The Art of Pepe
You assumed incorrectly.
Satanists want to ABOLISH ALL RELIGION and replace it with a perpetual 'movie' that has human sheep unwittingly viewing human masters as Gods.
Satanists are wanting to DIVIDE WHAT IS A UNITARY RELIGION OF ABRAHAM.
"They want you divided by race" - Q
No, it's true, despite what your Jew owned newspaper claims (kek!)
Your personal vision of what a group does is not proof that distinguishes where that group 'cares' or not.
>"Satanic Torah"
Satanists do not own, control or "Satanise" the Torah.
It's either The Torah or it isn't.
It's either a Satanic scroll or it isn't.
Logic.
Are you arguing Buckingham Palace was constructed by Moloch worshipers?
What's the connection (other than your smear of course)?
Jesus was a Jew.
>"I make accusation, you must 'persuade' me otherwise, lest my accusation is true"
That isn't how knowledge works for humanity, moron.
>"I make accusation, you must 'persuade' me otherwise, lest my accusation is true"
You're a Jew by your own ruleset you moron.
>>"I make accusation, you must 'persuade' me otherwise, lest my accusation is true"
You are a Jew by your own ruleset.
You defend and protect baby raping commies by deflecting to dividing religion just like your master Satanist script writers told you to write.
Anons are not bloodline cult psychopaths like you.
Spirit is higher than blood, runt.
So it's best to reply with leading questions?
Like have you stopped beating your wife?
Why not individuals?
>"Fuck you"
HAHAHA, TRIGGERED
What you are experiencing is called cognitive dissonance.
It's what happens when you see a document created AFTER 1856, that I can see, and you can see, that everyone can see, how that totally refutes and debunks your false narrative that it's "2000 years old".
I don't feel sorry for you, you brought this on yourself.
Now dance, muppet, give Anons more entertainment.
>Begone from this board.
What was it you anti-Jew shills said about which 'tribe' is calling for censorship?
kek!
Sounds like you are very familiar with relatively esoteric terms like 'pilpul'. I had to Google what that even was.
I kek'd.
Yeah, you're refuting yourself by your own ruleset.
Haha!
Sauce: https://www.facebook.com/freedomfirstnetwork/videos/799342633938347/
"bUt TrUmP iS iNcItInG ViOLeNcE"
>As I said earlier, Mr Jewish defender
No, I do not defend only Jews. I defend against attacks to divide Abrahamic religion.
>bring your best arguments why the 'Jewish collective power is bad' poster is wrong and then post them here.
As I said, that isn't how human knowledge works. Human knowledge is not derived from you making an accusation first and then not being personally persuaded to declare innocence.
YOU have to show YOUR best arguments that what you claim is true about the actions of individual Jews, is itself sufficient proof that it is true for the whole 17 million Jewish population worldwide.
The burden is not on Anons to prove a negative. That's a logical fallacy.
You're demanding that I accept logical fallacies to start any discourse with you.
Why haven't you answered any of my questions?
>Why don't you answer these questions?
>"So Jews are a protected 'race'?
I never said that.
>Why can't we criticize Jews or Blacks or Latinos or Whites equally?
But that isn't what you're doing, you're only criticizing Jews, omitting criticism of Christians and Muslims.
>Why not Jews?
You can criticize individuals for their ACTIONS regardless of 'tribe', the problem is that what you're 'criticizing' is a criticism of 17 million people.
You're pushing straight up Marxist collectivist guilt by association.
>Have we no free speech when it comes to criticizing Jewish collective power or the holocaust fraud?
Have I no free speech to tell you that the burden of proof is on you as accuser not me or anyone else as accused?
You need to convince the world, the world need not convince itself to you.
>You are a Jew, you admitted it before
Where?
You've already admitted you're a Jew by your own ruleset.