Look at the word-smithing that went into this headline!
Police Investigating Antifa Supporter Michael Reinoehl in Portland Shooting
Antifa Supporter!
Not Antifa member, protester, or activist. Nope, they tried to isolate him away from "Antifa" by simply calling him a supporter. A fan of sorts.
Sauce: https://www.wsj.com/articles/police-investigating-antifa-supporter-michael-reinoehl-in-portland-shooting-11598904528
What will people do without their sports? I think we all know the answer to that question. Time for men to be men again.
Exactly! You noticed it too? The media is using very specific wording to avoid tying this guy to Antifa. They're trying to separate him out so he seems like a lone-wolf and not an Antifa member.
WSJ did it here:
The truth. Watching creates demand. Advertisers pay for eye balls. More eye balls, more money to perpetuate the degeneracy.
When I worked an office job, they had a sports jersey day. I didn't wear one and a group of guys joked about it. I said that I didn't like to watch sports. They said "what kind of man doesn't like to watch sports?" I said "one that doesn't tie his masculinity to watching other men tackle each other in spandex pants." Not a single rebuttal.
I'm feeling dumb at the moment. How does the tweet and drop tie together other than the loose "US Military" association.
Difference being I don't question someone else's masculinity for a lack of interest in my interests. ;)