>>10487495 (pb)
Stop. Moran. Just stop.
Your argument is full of conjecture but you don't seem to know it. Sure, if someone with diabetes gets COVID they die of COVID. However, you need to know if the illness that killed them was COVID or something else. Hospitals had massive incentives to call any respiratory illness COVID. PCR testing detects genetic material that matches genetic material from the pathogen that reportedly causes COVID. However, it does not appear to have been proven conclusively that the genetic material detected is causative for COVID. Not only that but a person could have residual amounts of not infective "viral" genetic material without being infected or sick with COVID. PCR testing is not effective for DIAGNOSIS. Diagnosis is a medical endeavor. Doctors were told to fill out death certificates in a manner that would presume a certain constellation of symptoms was COVID. Using flimsy methods our US CDC managed to call 160,000+ deaths "COVID". Of those deaths 94% had serious comorbidities that could have put them at risk of early death via many, many different viruses, pneumonias, etc.
You could argue that the whole set of data is pretty hopelessly corrupt and therefore neither the 160,000+ nor the 9,000 or so deaths is a meaningful number.
What you CAN say from the numbers is that of the 160,000+ deaths ATTRIBUTED to COVID, 94% occurred in people with such serious conditions as to make their demise in any given year not too surprising. What this means for the rest of us is that if you are young and don't have any serious chronic conditions, COVID (even if a real, novel virus) is a NOTHINGBURGER.