Anonymous ID: f44c98 Sept. 1, 2020, 5 a.m. No.10492207   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2327 >>2359

Tired of Big Tech censorship? Take action!

FCC is taking public comments on the Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Department of Commerce re Section 230. I've seen this here on QResearch, but not really anywhere else. There's a little over 2 weeks left in the window for public comment. Any of us fed up with the censorship of conservative voices need to be speaking out. Please share far and wide so others can comment.

 

Here is a cap of the announcement by Chairman Pai and the link.

https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-365904A1.pdf

 

Also a link to the page with comments filed, and pic related shows where on that page you can click +Express to add your own comment.

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?proceedings_name=RM-11862&sort=date_disseminated,DESC

 

And here's the direct link to the Express Comments page

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/express

Anonymous ID: f44c98 Sept. 1, 2020, 5:52 a.m. No.10492396   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10492359

>>10492327

This petition is asking for clarification do Section 230. Here’s an article explaining it somewhat.

https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b0a2ecf8-8ab3-4a03-8e0b-d9d2ba0d92cc

 

I agree it’s a fine line, but the big problem is that Twitter, Facebook, and the others are censoring what they disagree with and still get the 230 protections.

Anonymous ID: f44c98 Sept. 1, 2020, 7:01 a.m. No.10492765   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10492698

No, because he didn’t. The sexual assault was an incident against his ex-girlfriend - an adult.

 

https://wcca.wicourts.gov/caseDetail.html?caseNo=2020CF000736&countyNo=30&index=0&mode=details&_ga=2.5815667.19978607.1598968505-452910952.1598968505#records