Anonymous ID: 119083 April 16, 2018, 2:56 p.m. No.1068924   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9801

>>1068265

Absolutely amazing. Took these caps to show some perspective. They're from 140ft underground from the The New Grand Central Station - East Side Access video you posted, as you say just down the street from 666 - https:// www.hooktube.com/watch?v=iuxsrWQY12g

 

And yes, why is that superbombproof Roosevelt train still all locked up and underground? What was it transporting to have needed to be so reinforced for weight? Cray cray that he went to that extent to hide his polio, imagine, creating an underground railway to take him from DC to NYC so no-one would see him walking. Incredible.

>Back in the day of hunting/gathering societies, an autist would have been king, no?

TRUTH Anon!

Anonymous ID: 119083 April 16, 2018, 4:08 p.m. No.1069643   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9940 >>0205

>>1069596

TJ anon, TJ. Are you taking screencaps at all? We can have an accurate and proven timeline from your work.

From Deeds:

sumitomo bought from the cohens on 8/4/1987

sumitomo sold to tishman speyer on 3/30/2000

tishman spayer sold to jk on 1/11/2007

Anonymous ID: 119083 April 16, 2018, 4:25 p.m. No.1069823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9905

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EASEMENTS AND COVENANTS

Both easements and covenants can be affirmative or negative. However, easements are typically affirmative, giving the holder the right to use the servient land, whereas covenants are typically negative, limiting what the burdened party can do on her own land. Distinguishing affirmative easements from negative covenants is therefore pretty easy.

 

The real trick is distinguishing between negative easements and negative covenants. Both restrain the use of the land they burden for the benefit of someone else. In fact, the two can be so alike that courts sometimes call implied covenants “reciprocal negative easements.”

http:// www.dummies.com/education/law/the-difference-between-easements-and-covenants/

Anonymous ID: 119083 April 16, 2018, 5:47 p.m. No.1070718   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0807 >>1010

>>1070356

Anon, you're doing incredible work, making us proud. I'm seeing, with an untrained eye that there are no easements (N), and if (N) is negative, the owner has no subterranean rights. Would that be correct?

I can't delete your posts, however you can report them (arrow on the left before 'Anonymous'), and ask that the BO or BV delete them for you. It would be a pity to see them go though.

Anonymous ID: 119083 April 16, 2018, 6:16 p.m. No.1071037   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1121

>>1070807

NP, anons will figure it out if you didn't request a delete. Let me know if you need a hand. If it helps in ordering your images you can attach them one at a time and the first one will go on the lhs, the second one after that and so on.

Anonymous ID: 119083 April 16, 2018, 6:29 p.m. No.1071176   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1070952

The baker was always there and the dough was in the oven, should've said I was baking though, my bad, there was a lot going on. Sorry 'bout that. New bread's /comfy/ though.

 

The caverns: No doubts here either, especially seeing the scope of what's there already. It's bigger than CERN bro. And ah, I missed the dude saying that it was Teddy's train. Welp. Nothing like using tax payers money right?

 

Believe you're right about the art and artifacts and good point about them being able to borrow art from the museum. Fine point that is. Hm…