>get this - an unknown source
Gospel of Thomas.
But yeah. Also goes by "Q"
Pretty easy to search for online, too.
There's actually quite a few good "lost", and/or rejected, scriptures.
>So, now, when people bring up those lost documents, without knowing WHY they were thrown out, I realize they have not done their basic homework on how the scholars decide what is historical writing, what is folklore or fiction, and what can not be verified, using the historicity test.
You haven't done shit for homework, homie.
If you have, you'd realize just how fucked up our "historical" timeline is. Both regarding scriptures AND history. Not to mention the corruption within the respective institutions who force the "official narrative" upon us
But keep thinking you think you know how I think, after I post a dozen words and a pic. Then immediately dismiss the entirety, in desperate hope that others don't look and decide for themselves