>>10497605 linked successfully, so not sure why I didn't find it between the sequential post #s in another bread?
Regardless, be skeptical of the Kyle Rittenhouse narrative until there is confirmation.
The board can be used by [them] to distract anons, so just wanted to point out that this particular narrative seems like it could be a setup or distraction.
I keep wondering when people will be forced to pay attention.
I think people will be able to wrap their heads around it when they finally start diving in, but getting people to pull their heads out of the sand has been extremely difficult.
This is a shill…
But no - I'm not trying to "discourage the real story from being put forward."
I'm trying to encourage people to not blindly follow a narrative that has been designed to elicit specific emotional responses from anons.
I'm trying to encourage people to verify the claims before supporting a narrative they don't have enough information to justify or confirm.