>>10502422

Is Barbara Boxer MOSsad?

That's thesame AMY BOXERlooks like

Digging some moar on the Silverman Boxer connection and find this.

Check that address

Ethics Foundation Requests A.G. Holder Investigate Sen. Boxer

By Roger L. Simon Oct 26, 2010 12:22 AM EST

In a breaking development that may affect the close California Senate race, Pajamas Media has learned The Foundation for Ethics in Public Service sent a letter to Eric Holder last Thursday requesting the attorney general “begin an investigation to determine whether United States Senator Barbara Boxer violated any criminal laws or should be liable for any civil penalty for failure to disclose real property on her Personal Financial Disclosure Reports between 2002 and 2010.”

The Foundation for Ethics in Public Service is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization “that seeks to bring a new level of transparency, accountability and integrity to all levels of government in the United States.” Boxer is the chair of the Senate Select Committee on Ethics.

The specific property FEPS is referring to is an Oakland, California, home valued at over a million dollars and co-owned by Boxer, her husband Stewart, their son Douglas, and his wife__ Amy.__ The letter to Holder reads in part:

Despite the fact that Senator Boxer had an ownership in 854 Longridge Road [in Oakland], she failed to report this substantial real property asset on any of her personal financial disclosuresbetween 2002 and 2010. She had also failed to report the mortgage on the property. Further, she failed to report the purchase of 854 Longridge Road in 2002. Each year Boxer was required to have filed a “full and complete report.”

The filing of false or incomplete disclosure statements is in violation of the Ethics in Government Act. The Act authorizes the Attorney General of the United States to seek civil penalties against Senators whoknowinglyand willfully falsify or fail to report required information. Theknowing and willful concealmentof the existence of substantial amount of real property for a prolonged period may subject Senators to federal criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. paragraph 101. [other citations are available at the link]

https://archive.is/KjSTj#selection-1075.0-1075.424

all pb

>>10502081, >>10502107, >>10502116, >>10502216, >>10502240 anons posit on CrowdTangle and ties to fagbook / 4am talking points

>>10502925

Succeeded by Kamala Harris

>Is Barbara Boxer MOSsad?

Early life and family

Boxer, née Barbara SueLevy,[7] was born in Brooklyn, New York,to Jewish immigrants Sophie (née Silvershein; born in Austria) and Ira Levy.[better source needed][8] She attended public schools, and graduated from George W. Wingate High School in 1958.

In 1962, she married Stewart Boxer and graduated from Brooklyn College with a bachelor's degree in economics. While in college she was a member of Delta Phi Epsilon sorority and was a cheerleader for the Brooklyn College basketball team.[9]

Boxer worked as a stockbroker for the next three years, while her husband went to law school. Later, the couple moved to Greenbrae, Marin County, California, and had two children, Doug and Nicole. She first ran for political office in 1972, when she challenged incumbent Peter Arrigoni, a member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, but lost a close election. Later during the 1970s, Boxer worked as a journalist for the Pacific Sun and as an aide to John Burton, then a member of Congress.[10] In 1976, Boxer was elected to the Marin County Board of Supervisors, serving for six years.[11] She was the Board's first woman president.[12]

On May 28, 1994, her daughter Nicole married Tony Rodham, the younger brother of Hillary Clinton, in a ceremony at the White House attended by 250 guests.[13] (It was the first White House wedding since Tricia Nixon married Edward Cox in 1971.)[13] Before divorcing, they had a child Zachary, born in 1995.[14] Zachary held a unique distinction of being both the grandson and nephew of sitting U.S. senators.

In 2006, the Boxers sold their house in Greenbrae, where they had lived for many years, and moved to Rancho Mirage.[15] Boxer's first novel, A Time to Run, was published in 2005 by San Francisco-based Chronicle Books.[16] Her second novel, Blind Trust, was released in July 2009 by Chronicle Books.

>>10502975

https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/mossad-meets-resistance/

Mossad Meets Resistance

May 23 2014 / 12:06 am

Israeli espionage pushes the national security community to fight Israel’s inclusion in the U.S.’s__ visa waiver__ program.

By Philip Giraldi.

The American Conservative – Long-time readers of The American Conservative are certainly aware of persistent Israeli spying directed against the United States, but it is a subject seldom explored by the mainstream media. That taboo has apparently been lifted with the recent appearance of three feature pieces by Jeff Stein in Newsweek, “Israel Won’t Stop Spying on the U.S.”, “Israel’s Aggressive Spying in the U.S. Mostly Hushed Up” and“The Latest Document from the Snowden Trove Highlights Israeli Spying”, which together provide details relating to Tel Aviv’s persistent efforts to obtain American secrets. The espionage occurs both inside the United States and in Israel itself, directed against naive U.S. citizens, including government officials, who are subjected to aggressive recruitment attempts while attending meetings and conferences. It has even been reported that “CIA considers Israel its No. 1 counterintelligence threat in the agency’s Near East Division, the group that oversees spying across the Middle East.”

Stein, a Vietnam-era military intelligence officer, formerly a regular columnist on espionage issues for the Washington Post, now writes “Spy Talk” for Newsweek. He is highly respected in the intelligence and law enforcement communities and has excellent contacts within the government.

The recent exposure of the depth and breadth of persistent Israeli espionage against the U.S., which Stein refers to as both “unrivaled and unseemly” and “crossing red lines,” came about in a curious fashion. For some time, the Israeli government has been pressing for inclusion in the visa waiver program. The program permits citizens of 38 countries with low fraud levels, mostly in Europe, to travel to the U.S. without first obtaining a visa. It also mandates reciprocity, so that those countries do nor not require American visitors to get visas in return. Israel’s inclusion in the program has met resistance because it has high fraud levels, largely consisting of young Israeli visitors who overstay their visas and illegally work selling art and so-called Dead Sea products at U.S. malls. Israel has also balked at the reciprocity aspect of the waiver program, frequently exercising its prerogative to refuse entry to American citizens who are of Palestinian or other Arab origin.

Congress would dearly love to accommodate the Israelis,leading Sen. Barbara Boxer to introduce legislation allowing Israel, uniquely, to have the waiver despite its high fraud levels, while also permitting Israel to retain the ability to turn away Americans based on “security concerns.” Allowing Israel to have its cake and eat it too did not, however, go down well with critics, who noted that frequent discrimination against Arab-Americans was not acceptable. The Department of State resisted, and the White House has tacitly supported John Kerry on the issue.

>>10503001

The Honorable Mark Pryor, Majority Member

The Honorable Johnny Isakson, Vice Chair

Select Committee on Ethics

United States Senate

Room 220, Senate Hart Office Building

Washington, D.C. 20510

Fax: 202-224-7416

Re:Request for investigation of Senator Barbara Boxer

Dear Vice Chairman Isakson and Senator Pryor:

The Foundation for Ethics in Public Service, a non-partisan, non-profit corporation, respectfully requests that you begin an investigation to determine whether Senator Barbara Boxer, the Chair of this Committee, __violated the Senate Rules of Conduct by failing to disclose valuable real property on her Personal Financial Disclosure __Reports between 2002 and 2010. Because Senators’ “full and complete public financial disclosure” is at the “heart of the code of conduct” that this Committee and Senator Boxer are charged with enforcing, we believe this matter deserves your full and prompt investigation. See Senate Ethics Manual, Chapter 5, p. 124.

A Home for Senator Boxer’s Adult Son

In February of 2002, a single-family home in Alameda County, California, was conveyed by Vito Badalamenti, Jr., and Sheryl Badalamenti, to the following individuals: Senator Boxer and her husband, Stewart Boxer; and Senator Boxer’s son, Douglas, and his wife, Amy Boxer. The address of the home is 854 Longridge Road, Oakland, California, 94610. The property parcel ID number is 11-883-21. Upon information and belief, the home is worth over a million dollars. Public records indicate that 854 Longridge Road is encumbered by a mortgage, but is still co-owned by Senator Boxer.

Between 2002 and 2010, Senator Boxer appears never to have used 854 Longridge Road as a personal residence or for vacation or recreational purposes. Rather, it appears to have been the residence of her son Douglas, her daughter-in-law, Amy, and their two children. Senator Boxer’s California residence for most of this time (and for almost thirty years) was her home at 286 North Almenar Drive in Greenbrae, Marin County, California. See Beth Ashley, Boxer says goodbye to Marin; senator to split time between Oakland, Washington, and Rancho Mirage, The Mercury News, July 12, 2006.

But in early July 2006, Senator Boxer “downsized.” She and her husband sold and vacated their Greenbrae house to move to a home in Rancho Mirage, California. Id. Since that time, Senator Boxer has kept a home in Washington, D.C., with her daughter, Nichole. She has also continued to own a condominium in Jack London Square, Oakland, with her husband, Stewart. Id. At the time of her move from Greenbrae, Senator Boxer stated: “We needed to downsize… I have a son and daughter-in-law [i.e., Douglas and Amy Boxer] in Oakland. My husband’s office is in Oakland. It made a lot of sense for us to move.” Id. The Mercury News reported that in 2005, “the Boxers bought a house with a pool in Rancho Mirage near Palm Springs and now plan to split their time in Oakland, Southern California and Washington, D.C., where [Senator Boxer] shares a home with daughter Nichole.” Id. Remarking on her new homes, Senator Boxer said, “Jack London Square is a very dynamic area. And I love the beauty of the mountains” in Rancho Mirage. Id.

Accordingly, it appears that Senator Boxer’s only personal residences between 2002 and 2010 were her houses in Greenbrae and Rancho Mirage, her home in Washington, D.C., and the condominium she shares with her husband in the Jack London Square neighborhood of Oakland. She was merely an owner-investor in 854 Longridge Road, which was actually occupied by her son Douglas, his wife, and their two children.

Senator Boxer’s Disclosures Under Rule 34 and the Ethics in Government Act

Despite the fact that Senator Boxer had an ownership interest in 854 Longridge Road, she failed to report this substantial real property asset on any of her personal financial disclosuresbetween 2002 and 2010. See 5 U.S.C. app. § 102(a)(3). She has also failed to report the mortgage on the property. See 5 U.S.C. app. § 102(a)(4). Further, she failed to report the purchase of 854 Longridge Road in 2002. See 5 U.S.C. app. § 102(a)(5). Each year, Senator Boxer was required to have filed a “full and complete report.” See 5 U.S.C. app. § 102(b)(1).

>>10503055

cont

The filing of false or incomplete disclosure statements is in violation of the Ethics in Government Act, which is incorporated into Senate Rule 34. This Committee has jurisdiction over Senators’ compliance with Rule 34. Further, the Ethics in Government Act authorizes the Attorney General of the United States to seek civil penalties against Senators who knowingly and willfully falsify or fail to report required information. 5 U.S.C. app. § 104(a). The knowing and willful concealment of the existence of substantial amount of real property over a prolonged period may subject Senators to federal criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. See also Chapter 5, Senate Ethics Manual (2003 Edition), page 127.

Senator Boxer may assert that she does not co-own 854 Longridge Road for “investment” or for the “production of income” because her adult child, Douglas Boxer, and his family, live in the house. However, neither a desire to help non-dependents nor a professed lack of interest in realizing a return from appreciation on a real estate investment can create a special exception to the disclosure rules. For that reason, Rule 34 draws a bright line between real property that is held “solely” for a Senator’s “recreational or personal purposes,” and real property from which, even in part, a filer may derive income or a return in the form of future appreciation. See Chapter 5, Senate Ethics Manual, page 131. Likewise, the Senate’s General Instructions for filers advises that a “personal residence” used for investment or production of income “must be reported.” See Instructions, Part IIIB. “Conversely, property which is held or maintained purely for recreational or vacation purposes need not be reported.” Id. (emphasis added).

Here, Senator Boxer retains an ownership interest in real property—her non-dependant son’s home—which she does not appear to use for her own residential or recreational purposes. Senator Boxer will benefit from any future appreciation of the property, which was purchased in 2002. Further, it is possible that Senator Boxer derives income from the property, or receives some other benefit, depending on whether Douglas Boxer pays rent to the other owners and depending on the co-owners’ payment of their proportional shares of the mortgage. These circumstances would trigger additional reporting requirements