>>10509650 PB on the mathematical proofs of God's existence resident in the original text of the bible, in the form of numbers and math equations most Christians do not know exist.
Since we have the originals, many copies, and we understand all three languages, it does not matter how many times or how many languages the bible is translated into. We know what it said originally. And we can compare modern copies for accuracy. We can also compare them for mis-translations.
This sends all those "muh written so many times" arguments to the dust bin of falsehoods and irrelevancies.
Logically, when you have the original....
The whole "translated a million times" is irrelevant.
But the real key to the accuracy of the biblical letters in order, is exactly what the youtube by Missler, presented above (PB), that shows how God proved his own existence the same way Q uses proofs.
How many times until it is mathematically impossible that Q is not who he says he is?
Q may have learned this method of proof, by studying the biblical text... actually.
Every letter in the bible is also a number. The Greeks and Hebrews used their letters for numbers. Therefore, the Bible flipps into nothing but a book of numbers.
Ponder this.
Could something be in the arrangement of the numbers?
If there WAS a God he obviously could use numbers.
Did the supreme origin of consciousness write us a book of numbers in addition to a book of words?
Would such a supreme original consciousness know we would eventually develop the mathematical skills to find the mathematical proofs in the arrangement of those numbers?
The numbers in the orders placed, not only contain mathematical equations, but, create the structure of sevens. See the mathematical examination of the original Hebrew and Greek texts done by Ivan Panin in the post above. (Link to vid below)
A God who created everything we see with electromagnetism, and numbers, has zero problem proving his own existence.
Most of us are like the "normies". We do not even know that we are blind to the proofs, and, yes, it takes time to read Q proofs to see the mathimatical proof. Same with the ancient text of the bible.
No homework. No pain. No gain.
We are the ones who fail to look at the proofs, by failing to look at the number arrangements of the original text in the original languages.
See
>>10509534 (pb)
for the video Chuck Missler did on Panins work. It is mind blowing. The biblical text is one of the most mind blowing things a scientist or mathematician could ever run into..