>>10511666 PB on the vaccine legal defense issues.
By the way, we ought to set up a legal defense fund now for anyone sued for refusing to take the vaccine.
>Warpspeed makes the ingredients and everything else
>AN OPEN BOOK
>If you are ignorant about what is in the vaccines
>That is your choice
>But if you want to know, the choice is yours.
Trust me. I read every package insert these days. No chance of being ignorant on my part. But I have seen them not list the thiomerisol on the package insert… went to the hospital pharmacy, found it on the bolus box for the tetnus in question.
They find legal ways to get around telling you the truth about the shots.
But that is not the issue here.
The real legal issue is MUCH bigger.
The issue is who ownes you?
Do I get to walk over to my neighbor, stick him with a needle of my choice without his consent?
No?
Oh, he works for me. Mows my lawn. If he does not want me sticking anything I want in his body, he can go work for someone else?
Sorry.
I would be prosecuted for the crime of battery if I stuck my neighbor with a vaccine whether he worked for me or not.
Corporations are just fictitious people, and can be prosecuted for attempting this also.
It is a crime.
So, they will call it a "policy" and threaten to fire you if you do not submit? Really?
They demand the right to make policies that force permanent changes on your body? Think about that, because this is the definition of bodily ownership. The right to subject you to physical battery as a condition of employment……..Slavery.
So, now they get to tell you that you have to tattoo their logo on your forehead and be a walking ad campaign?
Mebbe I do not want a permanant tattoo.. mebbe I might not work for them forever?
How about they decide you need to be circumcised next cuz, you are a helicopter pilot who is going to be sent to the desert, and they do not want to be responsible for any sand under your foreskin? Infection risk?
Yep. Policy. You cut off your foreskin or go get another job?
People.
When someone can force you to damage your body, or make permanent changes to your body without your consent, it is called ownership… slavery.
Yes this can happen.
We may even head down the slippery slope and have these corporations or government deciding we only need one kidney?
Cant happen?
Look at China.
Involuntary organ donations anyone?
Consider the infiltration.
This is the kind of thing (((they))) are trying to set up in the law.
Dont want to follow company policy?
You are free.
You can go to a different master? THAT is the freedom they want to give us?
Yeah. Sue the shit out of them. What is IN the shot is irrelevant
It is the question of who has the right to decide what happens to YOUR body, whether shot, tattoo, circumcision… you name the permanent change. Who decides this in a free nation?
>I am also telling people who are threatened like this to sue the hell out of (((them))) for battery,
>practicing medicine without a license,
>"color of law" violations, whatever tools and laws we have,
>the strongest of which is the anti slavery law…. actually.
>>Yes, civil lawsuits charging the HR departments and management of corporations withSLAVERY if they mandate vaccine for the common cold as a condition to employment.
How about we just stand up for the Constitution and not get lost in irrelevant science on vaccines. The question is, WHO has the right to make permanent changes to YOUR BODY? or put more simply, who ownes YOU?
Slavery.
Practicing medicine without a license.
Battery coercion, crimes crimes crimes.
They are simply attempthing to write a policy that allows them to commit a crime.
Plain, pure, simple.
Corporations cant murder you.
Why should they be making company policies that allow them to commit battery against you as a condition of employment?
Why should they get to practice medicine without a lisence?
Why should they be allowed to make a policy that they own your body and can make permanent alterations if they so choose as a condition of employment?
Slavery.
Ownership of another.
Think.
Get beyond the vaccines here folks. This is a really useful slavery precedent if we allow it to happen in the law. It is really sneaky, and subtle, but this is exactly what they will be attempting.
CALL it what it IS, and sue their asses off.