Anonymous ID: dde846 April 15, 2018, 10:18 a.m. No.1052205   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2242

Yes they are, but ONLY the wages defined in the code:

 

Keep in mind this principle in statutory construction:

Legal Definition of expressio unius est exclusio alterius: a principle in statutory construction: when one or more things of a class are expressly mentioned others of the same class are excluded (https:// www.merriam-webster.com/legal/expressio%20unius%20est%20exclusio%20alterius)

 

Title 26 United States Code = INTERNAL REVENUE CODE (IRC):

 

> "Wages" is a custom defined term:

 

26 USC 3401(a)

(a) Wages For purposes of this chapter, the term “wages” means all remuneration (other than fees paid to a public official) for services performed by an “employee” for his “employer” ….

 

> Sounds simple, but what is this? The term "employee" is also custom defined:

 

26 USC 3401(c)

(c) Employee, For purposes of this chapter, the term “employee” includes an officer, employee, or elected official of the United States, a State, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. The term “employee” also includes an officer of a corporation.

 

> Oh, so the custom-defined term “employee” ONLY covers an officer, “employee”, or elected official of the United States, a State, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing.