Anonymous ID: 44bb91 Sept. 3, 2020, 6:36 p.m. No.10521172   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1188

>>10521080 It's fairly straightforward for PFs to find aircraft tht are CURRENTLY in the air. Looking for past flights, especially if you don't know any ID of the planes, is extremely difficult, tedious, and time-consuming. Usually non-productive. You MIGHT be able to get a list of arrivals on a given date from Flightaware, maybe needing a paid subscription. Then you'd have to check every single one to determine registration and aircraft type.

>>10521102 agree fren. r7

Anonymous ID: 44bb91 Sept. 3, 2020, 7:07 p.m. No.10521423   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1442 >>1457 >>1484

>>10521397

>>10521358

I said before.

This is a DATA ERROR.

It is not real data.

Real data does not flatline like that.

The sensors are not reporting the data,

or the server maintaining the database is for unknown reasons copying the same data point time after time.

I showed the solar activity and where to look it up. If the Schumann was actually flatline like that, there would be ZERO concurrent solar activity.

Even thunderstorms around the world can cause Schumann impulses.

Flatline is impossible unless it's data errors.

 

https://spaceweather.com/

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/communities/space-weather-enthusiasts

 

The ignorance is appalling sometimes.

You give anons facts and they still ignore the facts.

Anonymous ID: 44bb91 Sept. 3, 2020, 7:14 p.m. No.10521487   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1505

>>10521442

Look. You set up a detector, and a wire breaks. Or the amplifier it's connected to develops a fault. Or data transmission to the server is interrupted. Or the server database is corrupt and needs regenerated.