Re: LB China microelectronics fab went under
Maybe they're not so much trusted around the world anymore.
Re: LB China microelectronics fab went under
Maybe they're not so much trusted around the world anymore.
>>10521080 It's fairly straightforward for PFs to find aircraft tht are CURRENTLY in the air. Looking for past flights, especially if you don't know any ID of the planes, is extremely difficult, tedious, and time-consuming. Usually non-productive. You MIGHT be able to get a list of arrivals on a given date from Flightaware, maybe needing a paid subscription. Then you'd have to check every single one to determine registration and aircraft type.
>>10521102 agree fren. r7
No
I said before.
This is a DATA ERROR.
It is not real data.
Real data does not flatline like that.
The sensors are not reporting the data,
or the server maintaining the database is for unknown reasons copying the same data point time after time.
I showed the solar activity and where to look it up. If the Schumann was actually flatline like that, there would be ZERO concurrent solar activity.
Even thunderstorms around the world can cause Schumann impulses.
Flatline is impossible unless it's data errors.
https://spaceweather.com/
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/communities/space-weather-enthusiasts
The ignorance is appalling sometimes.
You give anons facts and they still ignore the facts.
Look. You set up a detector, and a wire breaks. Or the amplifier it's connected to develops a fault. Or data transmission to the server is interrupted. Or the server database is corrupt and needs regenerated.
God bless you too, anon.
interdasting