TYB
winning make anon sleepy
night frens
old story but still relevent
What’s your risk from coronavirus? Lower than we think, new study suggests
By JOHN WOOLFOLK | jwoolfolk@bayareanewsgroup.com | Bay Area News Group
PUBLISHED: June 22, 2020 at 6:00 a.m. | UPDATED: June 23, 2020 at 7:54 a.m.
>Overall, it’s probably less now than many likely believe, given the daily drumbeat of new cases, hospitalizations and deaths, according to new research this month by a pair of medical scientists at Stanford University and UCLA.
…
>The risk study by Dr. Rajiv Bhatia, clinical assistant professor of primary care and population health at Stanford, and Dr. Jeffrey Klauser, adjunct professor of epidemiology at UCLA,looked at publicly available case incidence data for the week ending May 30 in the 100 largest U.S. counties as states began to reopen.
…
>“The thing we are looking for is to start a discussion of risk,” Bhatia said. “We’re bombarded with data on death and cases.”
>The study found a person in a typical medium to large U.S. county who has a single random contact with another person has, on average,a 1 in 3,836 chance of being infected without social distancing, hand-washing or mask-wearing.
>If that sounds like a tolerable risk, consider the odds of being hospitalized. The study found a50-to-64-year-old personwho has a single random contact has, on average, a1 in 852,000 chance of being hospitalized or a 1 in 19.1 million chance of dying based on rates as of the last week of May.
I bring this up because OAN (One America News) is referencing this story every single news hour.
Every single show, the new anchor will do the same little piece covering this particular UCLA/ Stanford study.
Like other anons I am sensing the death of the Covid narative, despite what seems like a mounting push for a second (third? …fourth? …depends where you are…) round of full lockdowns.
Good luck and Godspeed, anons
o7
>old story but still relevent
Now with sauce!
https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/06/22/whats-your-risk-from-coronavirus-new-study-suggests-lower-than-we-perceive/
>I say he is a Judas Priest
<I think you mean Judas Iscariot
Like the dude that sold out Jesus.
^that one^
or perhaps you mean that treasonous traitors are also leatherfags by default
in which case I defer to your better judgement
>FUCK OFF ENDCHAN
EndChan is a place, not a person
I would advise a more specific handle for this anon you seem to think is shillary clinton
I mean its up to you
I come from /End as well
baked last bred (appologies for the rust, its hard to get out from under the fingernails)
poured free drinks for anons at the /end bar
but who the fuck cares about specifics, right?
literally cant stop kekking at this
Not sure why I find this so funny
but
while we are here, comfy as fuck
basically the entirety of twitter is currently in the middle of The Battle of Prolapse Hill
they were not ready
before I tell you, confirm that you have thouroughly burned your eyes out of their sockets with industrial bleech or the equivalent