Anonymous ID: 69934f Sept. 4, 2020, 11:09 a.m. No.10527311   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7367 >>7369 >>7376 >>7377 >>7412 >>7459 >>7484

Fifth Column

 

http://www.softpanorama.org/Skeptics/Political_skeptic/Fifth_column/index.shtml

 

We will define "fifth column" as the "transnational" part of national elite along the lines of "The Revolt of the Elites" theory. There are other definitions. For example

 

The fifth column is the people in positions of power, who act in the interests of another state, and they are used as a tool to achieve foreign state political goals,"

 

Modus operandi of the US imperialism (which of course never calls itself imperialist state) was always to install some puppets/controlled government as away to rule a vassal state without making it outright colony. So they polishing fifth column concept to perfection, providing strong ties of part of the elite via education in US universities, via their technological achievements, via advertizing of American way of life and export of American culture and first of all Hollywood films and via their multinationals, many of them have world recognizable brands. As Merkel told US congress during her recent visit to the USa one of her dreams when she was young and living in German Democratic Republic was to get a pair of American jeans. This is how neoliberalism operated as well. It relies less of direct military intervention and more of putting nations into debt slavery. The contry is controlled by its own fifth column – a tiny strata of "globalised" elite

 

Previous consensus was that the national elite generally shares the idea that the society in which they live works best when all members of society can engage in upward mobility and improve their status via education and entrepreneurship. If there are adequate upward mobility channels, then most members of society perceive themselves as belonging to the same team and care about ensuring that that this team succeeds.

 

But in the new "internationalized" world dominated by transnational corporations, the notion that a company or corporate executive of transnational corporation or a professional (for example, IT professionals) working in such a corporation is bound by an allegiance to their country of origin and work for its benefit is passé.

 

Such elite is leaching the country using stronger neoliberal states as "protection racket" and hiding their stolen money in London, Zurich and New Your with full knowledge of their criminal behaviour (and often support as they represented interests of multinational in their native country) by government of such neoliberal states. London generally contains the most interesting and disgusting collection financial criminals from Russia which amazingly after crossing the border escaping prosecution instantly became freedom fighter.

 

The elites of today are more bound to one another and in case of executives to the transnational corporations they serve more to the country where this international corporation reside, then to country where they reside. And this effect is not limited to executives. For example many programmers read almost exclusively the US computer journals and media and that naturally affects their "social affiliation". This was true even in the time of the USSR, when access to foreign magazines was extremely difficult.

 

Also the fact that the greed on neoliberal oligarchy (especially financial) is just overwhelming and the possibility to get higher salary (sometimes in convertible currency) decimates all other considerations such as patriotism and moral obligations. Amorality became a norm and Randism became a new ideology of elite.

 

In a sense prols people outside the elite became just tools, not compatriots and their standard of living means nothing. Ukraine is a pretty telling example of such a country.

Anonymous ID: 69934f Sept. 4, 2020, 11:15 a.m. No.10527369   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7376 >>7412 >>7459 >>7484

>>10527311

Elite [Dominance] Theory and the Revolt of the Elite (Silent Coup, or Revolt of the Rich under Neoliberalism)

 

http://www.softpanorama.org/Skeptics/Political_skeptic/Elite_theory/index.shtml#Revolt_of_the_Elites

 

The idea of "The Revolt of the Elites" and "The Quiet Coup" by Financial Oligarchy

Previous consensus was that elite generally shares the idea that the society in which they live works best when all members of society can engage in upward mobility and improve their status via education and entrepreneurship. If there is significant upward mobility channels then members of society perceive themselves as belonging to the same team and care about ensuring that that team succeeds.

 

But in new" internationalized" world dominated by transnational corporations, the notion that a company or corporate executive of transnational corporation or professional (for example, IT professional) working is such a corporation is bound by an allegiance to their country of origin and work for its benefit is passé. The elites of today are bound to their corporations, one another, not to the countries. And their greed is just overwhelming and decimates all other considerations such as patriotism and moral obligations. Amorality became a norm.

 

People outside the elite became just tools, not compatriots and their standard of living means nothing. This new generation of transnational elite are running the country like a regular for profit corporation in which they are both the members of the board and the controlling shareholders.

 

Not all elites are created equal. In the last half-century we have witnessed a dramatic expansion of American corporate power into every corner of the world, accompanied by an equally awesome growth in U.S. military power. The means the US elite is higher on pecking order then elites of other countries. That does not make it less transnational. Now the decisive factor in the selection of allies and foes is the respective actors' position on "free market policies" like trade liberalization, privatization and deregulation, that favor international corporations and related transnational part of elite. In fact, the USA recent "patterns of intervention" reveal no or little correlation between democratic ideals and the role the US plays in the affairs of other nations. Globalization that is very successfully enforced by the USA foreign policy establishment (which contrary to its critics proved to be very apt and competent in achieving its goals) amounts to a Quiet coup d'Ă©tat by transnational capital over the peoples of the world, subverting democracy and national autonomy everywhere including the USA itself, while ushering in a new stage of international expropriation of resources in the interest of elite and sending the US citizens to die for the benefit of transnational corporations.

 

In effect the transnational elite behaves as an occupying power, although less brutal, toward the US population as well. In a way America is just another casualty of the new transnational elite. Cutbacks in social programs, decaying infrastructure, declining wages, massive unemployment, and the rise of municipalities facing bankruptcy means not only that a republic in decline, but that unchecked appetites of transnational elite fit classic Marxist scenario – to expropriate as much above minimum subsistence level as possible.

 

An important additional factor is the a new elite despise commoners. As Christoper Lasch pointed out in his groundbreaking book: "The new elites, the professional classes in particular, regard the masses with mingled scorn and apprehension."

 

Playing with financial flows as if they are computer game lead to high levels of unemployment, which can no longer be regarded as aberrational, but due to labor arbitrage and dramatically improved communications became a necessary part of the working mechanisms of modern capitalist mode of production.

Anonymous ID: 69934f Sept. 4, 2020, 11:28 a.m. No.10527518   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>10527438

 

What kind of source???

An insider inside the Cabal organizations decided to blow the whistle and provide an alternate search engine at a time when Google was a rather new idea.

 

Since he did it on his own time, it still exists.

 

Was he evil or was he good? Does it matter?

Because the evil ones always warn us what they are about to do. If we do not stop them, thenWE HAVE CONSENTED TO BE SHEEP.

 

It's that simple, but its never too late to wake up.

This is why Q says….DIG!