Anonymous ID: 16bf6d Sept. 4, 2020, 4:46 p.m. No.10530802   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10530788

>The problem with Trump is that several members of his close circle (such as Kushner and Ivanka) are staunch, rabid neocons which put the interests of Israel before the interests of the USA.

 

  1. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

Anonymous ID: 16bf6d Sept. 4, 2020, 4:50 p.m. No.10530831   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0845 >>0877

>>10530788

>This faggot's touting stuff like this, which is why, alongside him going full retard all fugging day, isthe reason this baker is not noting his shit.

>

>The problem with Trump is that several members of his close circle (such as Kushner and Ivanka) are staunch, rabid neocons which put the interests of Israel before the interests of the USA.

It's easy to spot shill bakers, they work harder to keep important stuff out of notables than getting good stuff in.

Anonymous ID: 16bf6d Sept. 4, 2020, 4:53 p.m. No.10530855   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0863 >>0876 >>1175 >>1245

BAKER REFUSED NOTABLE

NOMINATIONS - 2

EXCUSE - CLAIMED FIRST IT WAS ALREADY IN WHEN IT WAS NOT, FOLLOWED BY USING A STRAW MAN THAT SOMEWHERE ON A WEBSITE OF CLOSE TO 1000 ARTICLES THEY CALLED KUSHNER A NEOCON

 

BAKER ON DUTY - NIGHTBAKER

Anonymous ID: 16bf6d Sept. 4, 2020, 4:58 p.m. No.10530896   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0917 >>0947 >>1010

>>10530877

Thanks for posting that all day "bakers" have refused to add good/important information so I have had to shoehorn it in myself. Notice that noneof you are saying the information is bad, just that I have to follow the iron will of the bakers.

Anonymous ID: 16bf6d Sept. 4, 2020, 5:02 p.m. No.10530946   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0974 >>0978 >>1035

>>10530917

>Your posts were noted.

these

>>10530185, >>10530191, >>10530194, >>10530196, >>10530210, Color revolution playbook

 

are seperate from these

>>10526780, >>10526798, >>10526802, >>10526822, >>10526828, >>10526837, >>10526843, >>10526849, >>10526859, >>10526878, >>10526887, >>10526894, >>10526900, >>10526909, >>10527311, >>10527369, Evidence of a Color Revolution Underway in America with supporting pictures tying into Q FIFTH COLUMN post

but keep going, the more you try to lie about it the shittier you look.

Anonymous ID: 16bf6d Sept. 4, 2020, 5:05 p.m. No.10530989   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0997 >>1014 >>1242

Government snipers on rooftops false flag operation

http://www.softpanorama.org/Skeptics/Political_skeptic/Fifth_column/Color_revolutions/government_snipers_on_rooftops_false_flag.shtml

 

The handwriting of the intelligence againces is on the wall in such cases.

 

For example, snipergate during EuroMaydan in Ukraine can be studied as a classic example. During the color revolution the intencirty of anger and pthe level of particialtion of population occurs, roughly speaking, on the parabola with it rays down. First, quck eslacation and more and more mass participation, then the intermediate peak and subsequent the decline of interest. The political forces behind the color revolution should feel the moment when the down slope became evident. And prepare in advance a provocation for the development of the second stage fo the conflict an armed uprising. In this case the tried and true method used by intellignce againces si a human sacrifice flase flag operation which is called "goverment snipers on the rooftops"

 

Here is how it was used in Ukraine during Euromaidan. Actually there were two separate stages of this escalation

 

The first victims were unknown students beaten by the police. Maidan in fact began to turn into a routine, into a Hyde Park for a huge number of idiots. Stagnated. Western leaders gradually ceased to visit there. No one knows if at least one student was punched in the face or if there were students there at all. But when you control most of the information space, it doesn't really matter. Maidan perked up, the schedule went up sharply. The first taboos were removed. Namely - now it was possible not to obey the power openly, to seize office buildings and residences, warehouses with the weapon and with impunity to beat the opponents and militia.

However Yanukovych survived and tried to maneuver. Technologists felt stagnation and acted already much more quickly, than in the first case.

The second was "goverment snipers onthe rooftops" or as is known in EuroMaydan history the "heavenly hundred". Currently nodody knows who were the snipers (the rumors are that they were from Georgia; one gave an interview several years later) and if they are still alive.

 

Thus shoting removed the taboo on the used of arms and at this point Yanukovich folded. Sacrificed "lambs" were buring under the new banners and people vowed to "take revenge".

 

"Berkut" was called off by this coward Yanukovich who bearely managed to ewscape hismelf from being shot. After that we saw pogroms, there were armed units, the train of friendship to the Eastern Ukrain financed by the oligarchs such as Poroshenko and Kolomysky. The civik the war began, Russia strated helping separatists and well know event foolowed.

 

The next taboo "deliverate murder of civilians" was removed in Odessa. It is possible that Western color revolution technologists themselves did not plan this. In any case, they crerated preconditions of which the most importantly is IMPUNITY of far right gangs. Taboo removed. Now you can shoot guns at the homes of civilians.

 

The schedule of escalation of the conflict again sharply went up. After Odessa the first armed legionaries from Russia and other countries arrived, far right "battalions" financied by oligarchs such as Kilomopyky emerged. I. e. all conditiones were created for the full-fledged war civil war and compelte fleeseing of Ukrain using the canon of "disaster capitalism". Standard of living started dropted shrapy, hyp[erinflation emerged. So Ukeiane was thrown in khaos simila rto the khaos after the dissolution of the USSR with all the similar consequences.

Anonymous ID: 16bf6d Sept. 4, 2020, 5:05 p.m. No.10530997   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1014 >>1242

>>10530989

At this point another false flag was staged (or a tragic mistake used for launching of propaganda false flag) – MH17 shooting took place. Which removed almost all of the remaining taboos. Putin became the second reincarnation of Hitler (conditioning of international community went at full speed), Eastern Ukrainian militias - terrorists, and Russians within hysterical and prepared Ukrainian discourse - Undermensch, with whom can be do as anywhere.

 

This is one of the last stages of dehumanization of residents of Ukraine. And it was very successful. Well, the main profit for the Western technologist was not Ukraine itself by geopolitical defeat of Russia as well as a perfect opportunity to unleash sanction (aka an economic war) against Russia and a turn of world public opinion against Russia and Russians.

 

Washington's Blog

 

We pointed out Wednesday that the Estonian foreign minister claims that the new Ukrainian coalition deployed snipers to discredit the former government of Ukraine. We documented Thursday that snipers are a common form of false flag terrorism.

 

Interestingly, while the new Ukrainian coalition denies that it deployed snipers, it is now accusing someone else – Russia – of deploying the snipers as a false flag event to create chaos.

 

[This assertion appears to be part of new Western media consensus] AP reports today:

 

One of the biggest mysteries hanging over the protest mayhem that drove Ukraine’s president from power: Who was behind the snipers who sowed death and terror in Kiev?

 

That riddle has become the latest flashpoint of feuding over Ukraine — with the nation’s fledgling government and the Kremlin giving starkly different interpretations of events that could either undermine or bolster the legitimacy of the new rulers.

 

Ukrainian authorities are investigating the Feb. 18-20 bloodbath, and they have shifted their focus from ousted President Viktor Yanukovych’s government to Vladimir Putin’s Russia — pursuing the theory that the Kremlin was intent on sowing mayhem as a pretext for military incursion. Russia suggests that the snipers were organized by opposition leaders trying to whip up local and international outrage against the government.

 

The government’s new health minister — a doctor who helped oversee medical treatment for casualties during the protests — told The Associated Press that the similarity of bullet wounds suffered by opposition victims and police indicates the shooters were trying to stoke tensions on both sides and spark even greater violence, with the goal of toppling Yanukovych.

 

“I think it wasn’t just a part of the old regime that (plotted the provocation), but it was also the work of Russian special forces who served and maintained the ideology of the (old) regime,” Health Minister Oleh Musiy said.

 

***

 

On Tuesday, Interior Minister Arsen Avakov signaled that investigators may be turning their attention away from Ukrainian responsibility.

 

“I can say only one thing: the key factor in this uprising, that spilled blood in Kiev and that turned the country upside down and shocked it, was a third force,” Avakov was quoted as saying by Interfax. “And this force was not Ukrainian.”

 

***

 

Musiy, who spent more than two months organizing medical units on Maidan, said that on Feb. 20 roughly 40 civilians and protesters were brought with fatal bullet wounds to the makeshift hospital set up near the square. But he said medics also treated three police officers whose wounds were identical.

 

Forensic evidence, in particular the similarity of the bullet wounds, led him and others to conclude that snipers were targeting both sides of the standoff at Maidan — and that the shootings were intended to generate a wave of revulsion so strong that it would topple Yanukovych and also justify a Russian invasion.

Anonymous ID: 16bf6d Sept. 4, 2020, 5:06 p.m. No.10531014   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1242

>>10530989

>>10530997

Since Russia supported Yanukovych, it makes no sense that the people who ordered the sniper attacks would want to topple Yanukovych and launch a Russian invasion. Specifically, they would either want to overthrow the Russia-friendly Yanukovych or launch a Russian invasion to support a Russia-friendly Ukrainian government.

 

In any event, AP continues:

 

Russia has used the uncertainty surrounding the bloodshed to discredit Ukraine’s current government. During a news conference Tuesday, Putin addressed the issue in response to a reporter’s question, suggesting that the snipers in fact “may have been provocateurs from opposition parties.”

 

***

 

A former top security official with Ukraine’s main security agency, the SBU, waded into the confusion, in an interview published Thursday with the respected newspaper Dzerkalo Tizhnya. Hennady Moskal, who was deputy head of the agency, told the newspaper that snipers from the Interior Ministry and SBU were responsible for the shootings, not foreign agents.

 

“In addition to this, snipers received orders to shoot not only protesters, but also police forces. This was all done in order to escalate the conflict, in order to justify the police operation to clear Maidan,” he was quoted as saying.

 

In other words, everyone agrees that the snipers were false flag terrorists sewing chaos and confusion … they only disagree about who the responsible party is.

 

watch for this at the patriot prayer rally or some other event coming up