>>10534149 (pb)
I think Trump often uses language such as "democracy" because, unfortunately, he needs to address people with very limited knowledge or understanding. When there is a fork in a road the two paths don't diverge very much in the beginning, but as the paths continue they ultimately end very far apart. Once the Democrats are demolished and Republicans purged, the "two-party" system is open to challenge, by better options.
>>10533984 (pb)
Why do the wicked always want "eugenics". Their conceit is that mere IQ makes one "superior" (if they even have that). Eugenics hides the obvious: If your survival is dependent on exterminating others it suggests you don't have much going for you. Also, your attempts at eugenics only breed better humans from whatever groups you are trying to destroy. I have connected a strong proponent of eugenics, Mary Lasker, to the increased funding for NIH decades ago. We should consider eugenics as a very, very strong force in government today, I think. People seeking power in order to control and limit the strength and growth of groups they don't like.
I agree with you about "3 Gorges". We need to combat the mentality used by "elites" that allows for the suffering of millions for their ostensible "benefit". Because world "leaders" have had this mentality for a long time, it is easy to think that a disaster wiping out the industrial capacity of China would help the rest of the world. China also has a horrifically contaminated environment if I understand how they managed to "develop" so rapidly. What would be the effect of rapidly flooding multiple nuclear power plants, etc? Better option: The US needs to address internal issues preventing the sensible development of local manufacturing. We are used to the environmental issues and if the "legal system" were reformed it would be much easier to address polluters and those seeking to avoid responsibility for industrial disasters (Santa Susana Field Laboratory, for example)