>>10534861 (pb)

Interesting phrase in that sentence. I'd like to know if professional anarchists who have funding sources within the US political class and possibly among foreign entities can truly be called "anarchist". They have an organization (even if it is "loosely" organized) with an apparent hierarchy and they definitely believe in coercing others towards their way of doing things AND they are using state power (comped DAs, mayors, Democrat money and perhaps even foreign funding) to do it! Are these people "anarchists" or something else. AINO's (Anarchists in Name Only).

https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/cspoa-over-40-sheriffs-stand-against-governor-newsom-in-california-time-to-deputize-posses/

Not sure this is directly related, but in the linked article is a story about a sheriff who did not allow foreclosures. I have wondered for some time if a bank can own property (frankly, if any corporation can) they are not human nor are they alive, though legal precedent dating to the 1800s in the US has given them the rights of persons.

It seems that the corporate structure is used to hide the true ownership of things as well as the true control.

I don't think ownership of property such as homes should be considered possible for a bank. I think ownership of land/real estate should be viewed differently somehow. I don't know what alloidal (sp?) title means but I think land and real estate should be handled differently. I've seen and heard of communities where people with little money are struggling to survive in places their families have resided for many decades or centuries only to lose their land/homes to rich outsiders with no love for the place. Doesn't seem right to me. Displacement due to "money".

I don't think I have a problem with this as long as other groups including "whites", Christians and others are not attscked when they do the same. After all, the constitution grants us freedom of association.

>>10536055

Due to massive amounts of hormones used to increase the growth and productivity of cattle (which people eat) plus other "feminizing" hormones/chemicals, girls usually go into puberty much earlier than in the past. I think we should try to limit our exposures to such chemicals. A girl who has her period at 10 may be physically able to reproduce, but I doubt she is mentally or socially ready for sex or parenthood.

>>10536125

"mernecaries"! Some new type of tooth-decay, perhaps?

I guess I could go with "mercenary", though.

I'm guessing many anons have had curious experiences with e-mail. I've personally had e-mail sent to an old gmail account delivered to spam when the e-mail was "anti-vaccine" or contained the word "liberty" in the senders name.

However, does it sometimes seem that e-mail accounts get flooded with undesired e-mail in addition to having desired communications thwarted?

Does Planned Parenthood spam people? How does PP get people's e-mail addresses? The screen cap is from an unsolicited e-mail sent to someone who is decidedly pro-life. The e-mail allows for "unsubscribing" but how does a person get on their list without subscribing in the first place?

When a person protests or takes action against PP clinics they can be charged as if they were attacking federal property. Plus, PP is tax-payer funded. Does PP use taxpayer money to promote itself, perhaps by buying access to e-mail accounts? Is PP in some respects, a federal agency? Does this amount to population control/genocide promoted and paid for by deep state federal government agencies? How much of our federal government is dedicated, not to serving the public, but controlling and even destroying people it considers "deplorable" (to borrow a word)?

Mary Lasker was a collaborator with Margaret Sanger on the so-called "Negro Project" which was involved in encouraging black "birth control". Both women were involved in eugenics and organizations that lead to the modern Planned Parenthood. Mary Lasker along with her husband founded the Lasker Foundation which is closely tied to the US NIH and is responsible for awarding a prize that is sometimes compared to the Nobel Prize. Could these prizes and influence on NIH funding be guiding the direction of US medical research?