>>10535410 (LB notable)
>Los Angeles plagued by human trafficking and underage prostitution & Undercover Footage (France24)
The 7 minute video report embedded in the article can be found here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy9KDANSoiE
>Yeah… nervous and not the best at pronunciation…but he did well….
>No one can stop that from being circulated on fakebook etc… no restrictions…. is an official hearing.
YT has a digital transcript with the video
i've seen many examples where there has been complete abandonment of reason
group think media bias has led to this but there is no way that i have seen a worse example of what
we are currently witnessing on the war on the drug hydroxychloroquine
it is not about whether my opinion thinks the drug is effective or not
it's about whether the big hand of government has the right to interfere in the doctor
patient relationship and to say to the doctor that you cannot prescribe this drug to your patient if you think it may save their life
that's what we're currently doing in australia at the state level
we have state governments that are putting rulings actually making a doctor liable to go to prison if he prescribes hydroxychloroquine to one of his patients if he thinks
it may save their life
now what was this based on
well it's based on the findings of our national covet 19 clinical evidence task force and their recommendations are and i quote based on the available evidence
hydroxychloroquine is potentially harmful and no more effective than standard care
in treating patients with covert 19 we therefore recommend that hydroxychloroquine should not be used
so how do they come to that recommendation
well this recommendation comes from nine randomized trials that compared hydroxychloroquine plus standard care to standard care alone
but deputy speaker when you go and you look at those nine trials that they looked at not one of them looks at the way hydroxychloroquine or the doctors that advocate for this drug say it should be used
the doctors say it should be used with zinc and also an antibiotic such as as arithomycin
that is how they advocate it for and also that it must be prescribed and taken in the first five days
after someone becomes infected but deputy speaker none of those nine trials that this evidence task force looked at actually looked at the drug under those circumstances
so they really should simply be completely irrelevant
but it gets worse
they go on
the vast majority of evidence is from the recovery trial which randomized 4716 hospital patients with covid
the recovery trial
what they actually did in the recovery trial which is in the uk
they gave the patients sick patients that had come down with covert that were
very sick and were very frail
they gave them a dose of two thousand four hundred milligrams of hydroxychloroquine in the first 24 hours
it's actually four to six times higher than the recommended dose so they dose these people up
with a toxic overdose of this drug and in fact the french medical literature says that a dose of only 1800 milligrams in the first 24 hours for someone that is 75 kilos is considered an overdose and can result in cardiac arrest and respiratory arrest
and yet in this trial they loaded these people up with well above what is a known overdose
this scandal gets worse a french magazine asked the gentleman behind this trial to explain the 2400 milligrams and i quote from the french magazine
and the quote was we have chosen the dosage that is in line with dosages for other diseases such as amoebic dysentery
and then professor perron said to that
this is the first time i have learned that we have used
hydroxychloroquine for amoebic dysentery in super toxic doses he said the classic treatment for
amoebic dysentery is another drug called hydroxyquinoline and the doctor this is a professor perron he he's concluded i think they confused hydroxychloride with hydroxyquinoline
and professor perron's quote was this man who calls himself a doctor the person behind this trial
is incompetent and dangerous
and yet this is the trial that our national task force hold up as their gold standard as the reasons
why they interfere in that doctor-patient relationship
…
this is an outrage and a disgrace and yet as i said this is what our clinical evidence task force is based upon
now what about a second opinion about hydroxychloroquine
well let's take a second opinion from a gentleman called professor harvey rich who's professor risk
he's actually the professor of epidemiology at yale - someone with almost 40 plus years of experience and his words were and i quote
i conclude the evidence is overwhelming there is no question that for people who need to be treated and are treated early hydroxychloroquine has a very substantial benefit in reducing the risk of hospitalization or mortality
he continued i am an expert in science and i can tell you the science is all one-sided in fact the science is so one-sided in supporting this result that is stronger than anything else i've
studied in my entire career