Good thinking, anon.
If you consider your enemy's various options (in this case to steal the election), you would war-game out counters, right?
Good thinking, anon.
If you consider your enemy's various options (in this case to steal the election), you would war-game out counters, right?
>Download and save before it gets deleted
Upload it to anonfiles.com
ALWAYS, before posting here
Holy shit, the IP hopping/multiple personalities as pretend backup/support in this threadโฆ a new record I think.
Excellent, anon! TY
There is a real need to dissuade people from using sites that are anonymous and/or outside the control of [them].
Anonfiles is fine.
Yep, exactly.
>probing
DWS went in, hoping to be able to throw her weight around to do some recon
< Not going to happen, Noodle head!
So she had to leave with nothing.
Having no real idea how much their plans have been comp'd, they won't know how much to compensate with fake ballots, and so it will be wildly varying fake ballots and obvious that they are cheating.
You'll get 5 different replies from his 'alter' IPs in the thread
>anon i think u r confused
He never learns.
I wish anons would make actual effort and put some copypasta of the article in the post, like we all used to, instead of title & link! This has become lazytown in that regard (nothing about you or any other baker, just sayin')
Anonfiles is fine.
Paranoia disables your momentum.
Stop believing hype and get moving again.
Anonfiles is fine.
"Election infrastructure" was put under DHS by Obama, so fucking with it is now a National Security issue.
kekworthy traps, and jujitsu of turning their own ops against them!
Opsec = good
Paranoia = bad
You have much to learn.
I would love to see some salt on this, from the socials. Surely some people's hair is on fire over thisโฆ
Ding, ding, ding!!
Your paranoia has not helped you at all, but you can't see that. I actually feel sorry for you, lad.
^^^^^ Smart anon understands the scam.
FINALLY someone else who sees!
I don't know if it's still up but there was a separate thread on PLG with a lot of great info in it..
> But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted.
Here's the out - if there is disagreement, then the electoral votes do count.
I'm sure the DS/D have also gone through as many scenarios and how they can exploit (cheat) in the aftermath (in this special session). But so have /ourguys/
>Going to be a hell of a show.
Indeed.