>when they got back from the moon
This is an instance where fundamental presuppositions need to be questioned
>Shame Eminem is such a deep state faggot, used to love his music in the early 2000s. Now it all seems packaged and part of (((their))) plan.
Although I’ve long been skeptical re: David Wilcock and the Ayyyys, he told a tale of a meeting at which record company execs were instructed (with thinly veiled threats) that music was to shift from rock/pop to rap/hip hop. And it was so shortly thereafter.
With what we know, and how popular music was manipulated in the 60s by the Tavistock psychocrats as part of a bigger social engineering program, this story scores well on the plausibility index.
[No sauce immediately to hand]
This is a play for all the marbles, everywhere. It is much bigger than the US.
I pieced this together over time from exchanges with an acquaintance that had advised certain very highly placed people:
A few years ago there was a changing of the guard among those who control the group. This change was characterized by younger and more aggressive characters stepping into the shoes of those that had guided the “slow and certain” strategy of earlier generations.
The new players at the top wanted to prove that the old guard had been too conservative - their multi-generational Fabian approach to the capture of power and resources was too slow and left too much on the table in the meantime.
The new leaders wanted to be the generation that brought the plan to fulfillment. They have big egos and wisdom is not part of their tool set. They are far more confident in the ability of technology to facilitate their capture and control of all the marbles than were their forebears. They have determined that they can push for the prize, not by means of the gradualism and stealth operation of the past, but more urgently and directly.
This change in strategy risks revealing the method to those they have previously deceived - and risks exposing who they are. But this was apparently considered acceptable risk based on their assessment of the probability of success.
This was the position some years before 2016, FWIW.