>>10550929

Are you starting to see why no one actually listens to him? Why his "ops" don't go anywhere? On the one hand it's all about attention & feeling important (narcissism) and the other about dissipating anons' energy and attention (syphon off anons into chat rooms, off site boards on endchan) and vampire their energy into doing tasks for him.

Nothing has changed.

On the other hand, the "ops" are poorly thought-out and constructed, because the focus is on creating ops rather than making them successful, so the hashtags don't actually work, but stick out and get negative attention (little use by small amount of people = easy to identify and silence) and get anons shadowbanned or banned.

>>10550961

No. You keep pushing this. But no.

>>10551029

It's a tantrum.

Since the link to his separate board was removed he's going to be as obnoxious and spammy as he can be to make it as painful as possible for anons and bakers (attrition) and so bakers relent and put his board link back in to make it stop (appeasement).

>>10551159

>California Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra said Thursday the state is attempting to reverse the Postal Service's new policies.

hmmm… Does a State really have the power to "reverse the policies" of a Federal Agency??

>>10551153

→ >>10551099

It is selfish at its core.

>>10551209

Cardi:

>I can make millions go vote

>I can make

Really?

Sort of the opposite of drugging her Johns and robbing them…

Preddy big head she's got dere…

>>10551298

I ask myself that often. They just mine the craziest things they can from twitter and sometimes here but never look at what we've found.

For example:

Spreadsheets on-

Q posts & what anons found

Resignations

Sealed indictments

Sex-trafficking/cp etc.

(sure I'm forgetting something)

The reason is because it shows what they are actively trying to hide from the public. If they studiously avoid the sex-trafficking spreadsheet info they can claim that it's "baseless" - except the niggling little fact that the spreadsheet is based on THEIR OWN REPORTING of cases (+ DOJ announcements).

It's intentional. It's dastardly, and they are implicated, so they must avoid the evidence we've collected. If they did not, it would destroy them.

>>10551339

TY, anon!! You, too! <3

>>10551340

No one but a mentally ill poseur.

>>10551400

It is, except they don't have any shame, and no remorse at using the dregs of society against itself and themselves (the dregs).

>>10551406

What was the movie called?

>>10551422

I heard that, too.

Otherwise pretty boring so far… mindless chanting

>>10551486

ok, ty

>>10551467

very, very polite