Can anybody give me a full (abridged!) understanding of this Red Castle, Green Castle stuff.

Maybe I've been lazy over the years and months. It was never high on my priorities to decipher all complexities attached to it. But it just seems to have meant so many things at different times that I just left it there to the esoterics till now.

At the beginning of the Pandemic - at least as far as it's effected the Western world, the green symbology was strong. The Irish Prime minister made a grand speech about 'so many asking so much of so few' followed by stark imagery of a castle bathed in Green… then the Queen made her big speech dressed in Green.

So in a way, Pandemic was judged to be a Green Castle moment - the beginning of a planned stage.

And now on the horizon after so many months is the oft talked about Red October. Major shift in plan designed for then? Whole new narrative ready to be unleashed? But what narrative. One hopes the virus narrative begins to crumble dramatically.

>>10554927

It's bad for business to harm your customers…….

Cigarettes?

Booze?

Cheap food full of unhealthy additives?

Illegal Drugs designed to destroy and ultimately kill - always a new customer around every bend.

Legal Drugs that cause more unhealthy side effects than aid in recovery from illness? More illness means more business/profit.

News that's known to be fake as supposed journalists write it?

Bad for business to harm your customers?

>>10554987

Your golf ball is way off- in some waterhole graveyard.

Personal Responsibility. Exactly.

No company gives a damn about the harm they might cause their customers. Profit is the only motive, and they can still make it whilst harming their customers.

And that was my only point.

G5 that info out to the rest of the world for me please. I'm afraid of it. It might pop too much of my corn!

>>10555042

WHO love us so much!!!!

Group hug everyone - all 7billion of us. The gush is dribbling.

Incidentally, in a world of false figures and dodgy 'facts' why are we so ready to bélieve there are 7 billion of us?

>>10555075

Companies have proven time and time again that the maxim 'no company can afford to harm their customers' to be untrue.

What your personal philosophy might be doesn't impact on the General truth that yes, companies can exist, can make profits and can dismiss the welfare of their customers all at the same time.

This was my point and continues to be my point. Go back to the initial post. The presumption was G5 technology wouldn't knowingly harm their customers. I say in the general logic of real human motivation and real world history, that's simply an untrue maxim.

Can you bet on things like whether or not Assange was ever really holding out at that Embassy in London?

How could you lose or win such a bet as how could you ever prove the truth?

London has a very old and complex tunnel system…. I'm sure plentifully subsidised with unspoken secret connections unknown to the general public.

All Assange had to do was appear a few times a year at the window and make sure the 'watchful' bobbies are always there underneath - ready to arrest him if he ever tried to escape!

Oh dat poor puddytat and them nasty policemens………….

>>10555168

Yeah. I know that - thus the multimeaning conundrums. But I was trying to think about coding between green and red in other formats

>>10555177

Two dark haired, dark eyed ladies?

My favourite kind from the box.

But what's the link?

Same girl?

Nah. Btw, I do the double spacing here just to annoy the 'Reddit' screamers.

>>10555209

That's not the point of a mask, even to ignorant normies who pretend they still believe this is a 'pandemic'

Of course you spotted the operative word - pretend.

What the Pandemic scare has caused is really a football game. People have a team they now support. That was the very purpose, one might deduce.

There is no logic in team following except loyalty itself. Your team might lose game after game but that only entrenches your loyalty. You're going to stick by them.

Same with 'belief' in the virus. Many people know it's just a game by now. You wear it either to show you're a conformist/loyalists or because you're feeling outnumbered in a sea of opposing fans.

I think many of the most angry facemask 'thought police' are really some of the most 'awoke' ones. They know they've been had but team loyalty makes the most doubledown on the nonsense. Knowing they've been had angers them. They take it out on people who haven't been had.

>>10555319

Might it be advanced as a theory that viruses actually don't want to kill you. People who die are bad hosts.

Viruses, by extention, might actually prefer bodies that have proven ability to endure and spread. People who have endured and prevailed against (or by hosting) many viruses would be ideal hosts.

And there is human history. Viruses using humans to survive, and humans through exposure to viruses becoming stronger, hardier, capable of inhabiting most environments.

New Science want us sterile so that we genuinely do need their vaccine assistance merely to survive on a planet we call home. We become the aliens.