>>10554676 (LB)

Guys, ROBERTS is going to decide the fucking election?

Comp'd, Deep State, alleged fucking criminal Roberts?

Tell me that the White Hats have planned for this possibility.

What's say we expose everything possible about Scalia's reputed pedophiliac tendencies, and expose everything about his alleged murder ASAP?

Why the fuck are we sitting on the purported treasure trove of information against these fucking "leaders" (e.g., Weiner laptop material, etc.) when we could put that shit to good use and clean up the fucking swamp, once and for all?

If we leave this election in the hands of Roberts, we're as dead as an aborted Catholic's fetus.

>>10555488

I think he may be talking about IVERMECTIN, a long-known, efficacious animal wormer with a number of effective off-label uses.

>>10555544

Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no ."

Thank God. And your Barry Soetero dubs confirm that, in fact, fucking Roberts is NOT going to decide the fucking election.

Phew.