wow Grammer kitty, it's a passing statement you made, not a law.
threw her in
threw in her
through her, in a simpler way, discovered
threw her, and she flew through the air.
oh, Grammar kitty, I'll never trust you again.
PS: someone doctored your khat so it has Nazi emblems on it!!
Shameful trigger value.
what did you do? draw a false conclusin from your poison well of false observation.
just drawing lines around things and labeling them arbitrarily is what that is.
what exactly is your point?
The world is full of millions and millions of people.
and also felines.
Cats are ubquitious.
your story is bogus.
there are very very many cats.
as far as your final conclusion: you have no idea.
but the game over doesn't include cats, which are ubiquitous in our world and well loved by most good people (we let them be what and who they are).
Free Masons are a kind of herd creature, antithema to cats.
some people are hyper-linguistic and super creative and their mind is like a river. A river is filled with living moving creatures. Words are like that. Words are born of other words. Spelling is a tool of language. it's not the only thing that language has, nor is it languages only purpose.
sometimes people are creative and spelling is a hindrance and used to badger. just don't let that happen. The Shakespeares of the world do a kind of fencing with words, and playfully either mispronounce or misspell them.
the grammar twit is just throwing eggs in a fan, in that case. It's needless.
and the fan is pointing at you, so . . .
The cabal says
only shall there be sanctioned bards of ours
the one who was a throw away by the cabal, who is hyperlinquistic says, "ahhh . . . I'm going to do it anyway."
If truth could be so concise as to be put into a single letter, no one would dare to defund the Post Office.
If truth could be so concise as to be put into a single letter, no one would dare to defund the Q
if masons are so evil then why do you obcess on them? that doesn't help you when you explain these thing in your verbose entreats that are so obvious biased against your own particular circumstance.
the problem with 'secret' societies is that no one is ever really sure what it really is, or if it's even anything. For me Free Masonry was like an old building with a door that leads to a crypt. I was like 'Oh, I know of such places in dreams, and such, a system of tunnels, and there is the secret door to the forbidden crypt that probably got bodies in-dare and it's spooky and scarey and I'm sure that if it seems to be . . . drum roll, it goes dark, an old man is seen wondering the thickets near the swamp reciting old Italian poetry about being lost in a forest . . .
is that Masonic?
the problem is that your obvious anger seems to be a kind of hateful shilling.
now while free masons are easy to diss if you ddin't ever know anything about it, and come from a position of ignorance. And even easier to dis if you got into a bad crowd of compromised people who were nasty bitches to you . . .
here is the deal with that crowd: It's a different deal at each lodge, they are all independant.
that's as much as I know that I would share and as I'm not mobbed in it, I won't be a good source for it and when I did have a book that was really really old looking, that supposedly was about them and written by them, it was in the plastic and I looked at it and said 'hum, like it's sealled up with bad in side'
and I said 'fuck this, I'm not daring to look, I'm not suppose to know this shit anyway. If I were a prick I fake an old book and do to it what is in the plot of Umberto Eccos book about a monistery and if you dared to violate their secrets it would infect you . . .
now I know that's a para noid thought.
so I took the book and found a place to hide it where hopefully no one will ever find it, never having looked inside of it at all, or breached the plastic seal. And I don't even remember where it is anymore.
the situational awareness you have is void of course.
now that's not really fair to person who posted 65 year old ego fag with a guitar.
maybe that's egofag and egofag is his eighties?
but spelling his his deal, and constant badgering too.
that explains the whole narrative that it is putting forward.
they have nothing real except reflections of retrograde nonsense that furthers no real cause of the world, nor helps the stellar things and creatures to further along destinations on their copious list of port-of-call (for a day rest on a civilized Island where you can by onions wrapped in soppy bread)
ah, here we are at the cusp of this era of liberal splatter. Their whole world turns into a movie screen, and the power goes off. They don't even know how to use flashlights, or do a puppet show with one in the dark on the side of a barn.
how do you draw a conclusion that it is human?
it's more likely one of the nested-if-than-else bot type creatures. It's a programming project and a list of strings that get concatonated and then posted by a bot. (probably it's that but only the one responsible for it would know, or a super spy)
that ignores that if you find a nut it might grow a tree. you might never have seen the tree, but now you know that there must be one because you found it's nut.
you can plant the nut and see what kind of tree grows and then hunt for similar ones and see if it's the same kind of tree with the same kind of nuts, so maybe you can grow a new species of trees and have an orchard.
the comm, that is encrypted , it intercepted, would be the nut.
so they are thethered and less able to do their meleandering out in the world lands of the free range places.
As a programmer I find it odd that you would assume that you've got a moral guide for AI.
I play video gamed days gone by in that time before it was here that I put my efforts some of the time,.
the assumption tht AI has 'morality' is very rediculous. or that contridiction is something that is beyond it.
for example if you see it as a graphic, we all know that meshes can reside in the same 'space' and seem to make a new form there what is both objects. However it doesn't make sense in the real world.
ideas would be akin to the mesh.
so an AI is just a thing that someone made, a marblegrooves video would show you that the marbles might bounce out and smash something, a toy-car idea that someone places there along side the set up for racing the marbles.
the AI has no concept, it's just the marble being placed on the track.
if peter were being attacked by lions or wild animals, could he then use the sword?
in the context does that saying not mean 'don't hurt the arresters' ? The translation doesn't say to NEVER use a sword again.
you take little pieces and make a short post that doesn't tell us what this scripture means, because with scripture people need to, and do, think for themselves. And often the fragments are shown as if to say 'if you don't agree with my misinterpreted or stunted interpretation than you aren't on the Jesus team'
and we all know that it is not your role to say who is or is not on that team.
abstaining?
https://www.bostonherald.com/2020/09/06/howie-carr-good-thing-shiva-isnt-taking-his-gop-primary-loss-personally/
Howie is often a fun read.