Morning fags,

Question for Tech fags from ignorant concern fag with some legitimate questions on a "new" privacy tool web site that spiked on the market this morning. Apologies for the concernfagging, but….

Do not have the skills to call this one.

Tech fag I am NOT.

However, True if BIG, and trustworthy and not a honey pot. But how the hell would I know if I do not ask tech fags here their opinions.

I realize I can get shot with shills.

Since real anons know how to sauce, I will read all advice and any sauce offered. Will be less tech ignorant for it… so.

Before I start, wanted to post this Google copyright case in case it was never notable here. Supreme Court…. prolly big. Please excuse if already notable: (oh, I looked up date…. will be Oct 7 according to slate) Pic 1 related.

https://www.crn.com/news/mobility/oracle-v-google-copyright-case-slated-for-supreme-court-arguments?itc=refresh

Now back to questions. This came through platform news while trading. See pics 2,3,4 related.

Here are the links from pics related

TotalOptOut.com

FYI on the market ticker in case it is needed (NASDAQ: SRAX )

Looks like that is the ticker for bigtoken.com.

From Article:

BIGtoken is a permission-first consumer data management platform. It is the first consumer-managed data marketplace where people can own and earn from their data.

Article Sauce:

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200908005735/en/

Author I believe:

Natalie Santos press@srax.com

That is everything I have.

Sending myself out to research this would only bring bad advice back, I am sure. Not my wheelhouse. I am law and biofag.

Google case is gonna be watched, so heads up.

Thanks guys.

Hope this is what it is claiming to be? But, with the recent news about the honey pot VPN's, the tech ignorant among us can only trust anons with sauce these days.

We are the news now :)

>>10565898

Residual thought as a law fag.

This COULD be a way to sign away privacy rights that are given by the constitution in the first place. (HIPPA laws are another example) You have a right to medical record privacy in the Constitution to start with.

So how do (((they))) get you to sign away your rights?

They create a bid so called "medical privacy law" which fools consumers into thinking that they do NOT have privacy rights in the Constitution already. Then, when patients sign the HIPPA form at their doctors office, they do not read the fine print on all the businesses that get to own, transfer, use the personal medical data.

No kidding.

Next time you are asked to sign HIPPA picking up pharma meds, or at the doctors office, take one moment to read what they are asking you to sign.

They could not share all your data with all these corporations, without your signature is my lawfag guess. Otherwise, why write the law, and why does this law require a signature to be "activated"??

Logical thinking.

>>10566128

>10565898 (You)

>I don't know, but my hunch is that it's a big-data marketing company, posing itself to the consumer as a privacy-oriented company, and is trying to position itself into a future paradigm where customer data is obtained with some transparancy and the users' permission.

>>10565898

Thank you so much anon. I so much appreciate your gloss on this. Kind of like the hippa thing then. More likely to be a back door honey pot kind of thing.

>>10565949

>I think you are starting to answer your own questions and are on the right track on this.

Thank you for your response anon.