Couldn't a really solid argument be made (legit or not) that arresting, for example, Hillary Clinton (not running for anything) would not be interfering with the election?
Or what if she is arrested ON election day or the day after, and it's kept out of the news (solid claim it didn't affect the voting), and we run into the chaos that's being eluded to by Dems…but now THAT'S thrown into whatever legal/optics/public opinion outrage stew? Claim could be, "Hey, we waited until voting was over for the information to be made public." And THEN maybe public outrage becomes SO GREAT at the nature of the crimes (if they truly "go for it" and put the nasty shit out there), that any contesting of the results sways mightily against the Democrats in general?
Just considering possibilities. Whatever the case, I've seen enough to know this plan (whatever it is) ain't no junior varsity effort.
POTUS is motorcading to AFBA today. How often does that happen, instead of using M1?
Your stamp is easily broken down to three 4's and a 2
4222?
Doesn't seem like this would be the photo in question, but it IS "off" in that it's not from the reporter/mask incident yest, but from 119 days ago in a Q-drop. If the press were REAL, any decent reporter would make the connection and say HMMMM!?!?
Well, my first reaction was to think that you offered a much better than standard clue, but then thinking on it for a bit, that could be any number of past sins or hypotheticals yet to come. If Obama truly pardoned everyone for prior crimes, might have to be some secondary offense. This "future proves past" can be a plain in the ass, but c'est la vie.