>>10565228 (lb)
>>10565201 (lb)
This actually makes a WHOLE lotta sense, and explains a lot about... a lot. LOL.
>>10565340 (lb)
Problem is, no one's ever produced a single journalistic piece or government document proving this. Much like a bunch of other stuff that is "known" about Assange.
That's the thing about @POUTS. Everything could potentially be a trap. Check this out:
https://nypost.com/2020/08/13/trump-a-lot-of-people-think-edward-snowden-not-being-treated-fairly/
>President Trump polled his aides on Thursday about whether he should let anti-surveillance whistleblower and leaker Edward Snowden return to the US from Russia without going to prison, saying he was open to it.
>“There are a lot of people that think that he is not being treated fairly. I mean, I hear that,” Trump told The Post in an exclusive interview in the Oval Office, before soliciting views from his staff.
If you are working in the White House, and you put forth the view that @Snowden is anything other than a traitor, especially considering what we know via Q, you might just be advertising to everyone in all the right positions in gov't that you probably shouldn't be in gov't.
https://qanon.pub/?q=snowden
Republic. It's a republic.