>10566246 PB

>10566150

>>Twins are two different people with their own souls

>Clones- by definition- do NOT have souls.

>>10566246

Hmmm, mebbe some sauce with that statement would be interesting. Good question.

Judging by what happens in the bible, I would say that whether or not a clone has a soul is answered by the question "who does God refuse to resurrect?"

And even then, it appears that genetic hybrids not made by the hand of God, CAN have souls, but, if they are DNA hybrids those souls will NOT be resurrected. This would include biotech experiments, and even those nephalim giants, whatever we learn about those in the future.

I always hold my understanding open for further information, but, this is what it looks like to me at the moment, based on years of study of the ancient text and commentaries.

Many Christians read bible commentaries during study.

There are three missing scrolls mentioned in the bible, that are not found until the Dead Sea Scrolls were found in 1947, the same year Israel appeared on the planet, prophesied to happen by Christ, in… if I recall, the fig tree parable in the Olivet discourse.

He tells his apostles then, that when Israel appears, start looking for the signs of the end times they were asking about.

To add to this:

Remember Daniel was told by the angel to close the book of prophecy until the end times, meaning, more revelation or new clarifications on mysteries will be revealed in the end times.

“But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.” Daniel 12:4

So…

God could not explain the quantum world, until knowledge was increased…. looks like, to me. And when you READ the bible, in light of the quantum world, tons of things make sense that did not make sense before, including angels, demons, and what will happen to them.

Apparently we do not know everything the bible has to tell us, until the books of Daniel are opened. I keep that in mind. New revelations will be made by the bible, and whatever books Daniel was told to close.

What could those be.

There are three what I would call "Gods Recommended commentaries" in the bible.

They are not the bible, but, usable for clarification, since God apparently took pains to make sure we knew to keep an eye out for them in the future. These are the only scrolls mentioned in the bible that are NOT IN the bible. Two of them clarify a lot. One is Enoch, the other is the book of Jasher.

Add these known commentaries to the biblical text and I get the following out of it:

There are only 2 classes of beings on the planet that are not resurrected in the ancient text.

1/2

>>10566935

2/2

In one of the commentaries, the book of Enoch, God specifically points up the first class of hybrids, and says they will NOT be resurrected,, but that their souls would be left to wander the planet, looking for bodies to live in. I currently see it as a point of clarification between evil angels, and demons. Evil angels are never looking for bodies to live in. Demons, a hybrid class, are always trying to "possess" a person bodily. But in Enoch, God says he will not resurrect one of these hybrids, period. By resurrected, we mean given a new body, after this one has gone to dust.

According to Christ, this new body will be like the one that he had after crucifixion, when he appeared to the apostles in the upper room without opening a door. Able to move through the walls, like wifi light, but, able also to be physical, because he told Thomas to stick his finger in his nail injuries. The body of Christ was a bit like wifi. About to move through walls, but also able to effect things in the physical world, like wifi light effects your very physical phone today.

Non resurectable class one, is a group of beings that are supposedly a hybrid genetic cross between humans and angels who "left their first estate". ( The bible describes beings in a way that parallels the descriptions of the quantum world/quantum physics, beings of light). These left the "quantum world" to come to the "material world" (Classic physics applies, not quantum mechanics, all light quarks are apparently arranged by laws of classic physics into what we know as the periodic table of atomic structures)

See Genesis 6. Nephalim, hebrew, plural ending, "the fallen ones" was translated to the word "Giants" in the King James. There is a lot of language study needed to understand the translated message, but, bottom line, these things were hybrids.

Most Christians are taught the "Sons of Seth" doctrine that did not appear until later. All of the apostles make reference to this "hybrid angel" time, whit phrases referring to angels who knew "strange flesh" etc.

After looking at it, I would say the weight of the biblical research goes to that theory that explains all parts of the bible consistently, and have come to the conclusion that there were evil angels (quantum beings of consciousness) that created some kind of either biotech, or other human-angel hybrid. These can not be resurrected, according to the biblical commentaries recommended by the bible itself, that were located nearly the same time that Israel became a nation.

Class 2

The other group that can not be resurrected is a group of humans in the end times who take something called the "mark of the beast". See the book of Revelations.

Looking at the Bill gates vaccine, and other data, I would say that this is not a vaccine, because it would be the first to inject DNA or RNA t into our bodies to fight disease, which, may in the future be used to CHANGE a persons DNA. If this would be the future case, then, DNA alteration of any kind is a soul, that God states he would not give a new body according to Genesis, and the commentaries recommended in the bible?

Apparently DNA that has been corrupted is not resurrected in a new body.

Whether or not the clones can be resurrected, would depend directly on the question of whether their DNA was altered, or, whether they are clean copies, as happens in the womb, I can only guess.

>>10566970

Yes, I can agree with everything you said, and these are the subject I am speaking of with one exception to your phrasing here.

These are not pre-Adamic, Adam, being the Hebrew for man. Biblically speaking, the first human. Logically, there could be no daughters of men, before Adam (man), the way I read the logic.