>>10569733 (PB)
>WHY isn't @jack responsible for allowing it to stay up? Anons proved last night twitter CAN reject certain photos! They suspended accounts within FIVE SECONDS of multiple Anons posting a collage of pedo Joe touching kids!
confirmed
twitter algos censor pedo joe in less than five seconds
pic related
its almost as if the Twitter Child Sexual Exploitation Policy is not genuinly designed to "prevent" sexual exploitation of children
but more to prevent the exposure thereof
previous bread links with more sauce
>>10563379 (PB)
>>10563224 (PB)
>>10563278 (PB)
>>10563395 (PB) -kek
>PROVING he knowingly allows his platform to host child porn sharing pedophiles!
BOOM
5:5 anon
humbly request a good meme anon figure out how to condense this information into a niceRECONCILEmeme
>One image of Joe Biden touching kids insta-censored
>thousands of images and videos of violent sexual abuse of todlers and infants allowed to fly duty free
ammo:
>>10563379 (PB)
>>10563224 (PB)
>>10563278 (PB)
>>10563395 (PB) -kek
FG&C
o7
>What if we rotate the pictures?
will give it a shot and report back, anon
good idea
anons were cutting the image up into pieces/ re-arranging the tiles last night and it seemed to work to get past the algo
it seems they are flagging something about the photo that doesnt care what the filename/type is, but can 'see' that its the same image
merely changing the pixel arangement slightly effectively defeats the insta-censor
o7
>>>10571404 (You) Anon shows Twitter censoring tweets mentioning Joe Biden touching children
bakes
it seems it is the image that twitter is insta-censoring, not the text
we made multiple attempts last night using no text, or very simply JUST "test"
as long as that one image colage of biden is in the tweet, your account gets locked in less than 5 seconds from posting
maybe edit the notable to reflect the image as opposed to the text
5:5