>>10574865

Two sides of the same coin, anon.

Nazis and Communists were both collectivists. Fascists simply believed the state could properly embody the people while communists existed in a state of dissonance where they rejected the idea that communism required a central authority and then accepted a central authority that arose after destroying the status quo.

Hitler saw what happened to Russia in the bolshevik revolution and absolutely hated it - saw it as a heinous destruction of the nation and its capacities. It also didn't inspire much love for jews in him, either.

What Americans need to understand about European politics/economics is that there is no economic right as we think of it. Virtually all european economics is collectivism and everyone is in various states of incomplete collectivism on the way to the one true economy of collectivism. Individualism has been bred out of them at this point and there is no capacity for entertaining it in their societies.

Therefore fascism is the only practical state they will ever live under and the progressives are simply communists who argue against the need for a state in a belief that some sort of cosmic collective consciousness will resolve humanity's problems.

So when we are talking about nazis and communists - we are talking about state centered collectivism versus anarcho-communism.

Who is all buddy buddy with China, also is sponsoring the virus hysteria, and formerly backed the nazis?

>>10574930

Obviously, the rational explanation is that someone has a roomba with suction cup wheels running around on the firmament with a cell phone.

>>10574915

This is partly true. Hitler aligned with Hassan Al Banna, who created the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. They were key to expanding the control of the Nazis into Africa. Many people miss that part of World War 2 - suddenly Nazis were in Egypt before they'd so much as sent a tank through Belgrade or Sarajevo.

But one should not forget their research and look into who Hassan Al Banna was - to include the name of the MI5 agent Freya Stark.

Nor should it be forgotten that the british made world war 2 possible by abandoning supplies and munitions ahead of early German advances, which allowed them to secure critical supplies for the war effort.

>>10575009

Q asks if the nazis were ever truly defeated.

Think by way of proxy wars.

The battle for castle iter - look it up, thinking about how the story unfolds and who is left to frame the events. Also consider royal lines and shadow rulers.

Then ask if we are taught the full extent of who/what the nazis were.

>>10575018

I am extremely skeptical of that installation. If we have detected gravity waves, then EVPs and global consciousness are scientifically valid phenomena.

The reason is in how it works. They are measuring fluctuations in noise. This means listening to static or watching 'snow' on a television and determining that because one pixel on the screen was 0.02% brighter on the average, there was something causing that to happen and therefore a discovery had been made.

The standard for this in particle physics is seven sigma outside the standard deviation. If you place a section of data on a bell curve for its frequency of appearance or statistical likelihood, it needs to be seven sigma - less than a one in a trillion possibility it is statistical noise.

LIGO gets to make its own rules, and work off of only five sigma events… When they also get to pick their data to bolster their claims. Reading fluctuations in noise is difficult enough to use for science - and that is when you can control an experiment to show what is normal.

When you have no controls on the observational study and are simply inferring from noise events that can only be described in theory with no independent verification….

It's a situation ripe for confirmation bias in the most honest of cases. Realistically, that's a very expensive interferometer that needs to generate success stories for itself.