what is that old story?
the guy says 'make me one with everything'
poof, he becomes a meal with all the fixings.
either they become link minded puppets or they wouldn't get promoted.
The disconnect has existed for a very long time. Only few every make it who aren't, what was the term?
It was very technical.
they were called 'weenies'
It's only tiny napolilian complex types who see 'tall' as 'advanced'
tall people don't have that hangup.
that's not true.
you're lying.
in Sodom the sin was rape and murder
it wasn't that they enjoyed the compnay of rugid men and supported them and pined over their well being and did wrestling for sport, and it gets carried away.
in Sodom a stranger would come. It was a custom back then for people to be curteous to strangers. But in Sodom what they would do is have a sex party with the stranger as the victim and then after that he'd be killed. I don't think it said that they also ate the victim, but it wouldn't surprise me.
So how is that 'homosexuality'.
a man who loves another man at the level of him being a spose doesn't want to kill the other person.
you've been psyopped into believing lies.
I don't dare to speak for God.
what I observe from my copioius reading of history is that Homosexuality was so common as to be ubiquitous, they just didn't tell the wives.
and often it was so common that the wives had to have known (don't they? )
who knows. Very very common.
killing people for sex: that isn't common.
murder for a sacrifice to their 'god', as part of a ritual? that's not common (It was condemned and those who did it were executed for it).
my 'take' on the story is what I give.
but I draw a conclusion from it:
sex and sxuality as part of a ritual to 'worship' is condemned. That is the thing that Sodom seems to have been part of.
you know full well that the 'condemn the homosexual' narrative was used because so many powerful men are . . .
and it's a great tool for assholing blackmailers to psyop someone into thinking just because you have fond thoughts for another man . . . that you are sinner . . .
bullshit.
collectivized guilt
'we' had no control when 'we' were born into a broken system. 'we' are not to blame.
I decide to warm peole: promiscuous sex and orgy behavior leads to disease and early death.
it's a moral choice to tell them: that is unsafe behavior, do not participate.
statistics show if you got to a sex cult ritual and participate in the 'knife and blade' sacrifice event . . . that you might not leave there alive.
butttt where is the sauce?
bleed out on the floor of the 'club'.
do we have any luminalle and a black light? we could show you.
If I know that a door leads to a tiger and you say 'don't be a judgey moral jerk, let them go in that door', if I warn and you say not to warn . . . who has really opened up a door where a tiger is?
me?
if you follow my advice and abstain from sex with skizzy strangers you will have no fear of all that would come from that.
the 'oh it's bad to judge' should never tranlate to 'adults should stop suggesting strong success behaviors.'
participation in some activities results in very strict conseqeunce to health and well being.
Open the door and the demons come in.
Pandora didn't have the option to shut the box after it got opened.
in the case of the 'thought tiger' that is behind the door? I think we never find out in the story what it does look like because people aren't stupid enough to open that door.
but if it had to have a face? Or a personality?
it's like when someone says 'wow this is muddy let's do something else in this spot.' and they build a frame and they make a concrete walkway with drainage and it's cool and it takes some time to firm up. so they put a sign that says 'wet cement' and police tape around the area that says 'do not cross'.
you're the guy who says 'how dare you tell me where I can walk'
you can either do what works or you can fall in to the mud.
you act like I'm pushing people into the mud by saying 'look there is some mud'
If you have sex with someone who has a ghonaraheiia or venerial disease . . you can catch that. It has serious consequences.
you say 'how dare you moralize a germ'
I think that when someone becomes more adult, there are other ages past 27 where awareness is gifted of some responsible behaviors to those who dwell in the restful mind and meditate. When you get to that more adult age of 40 you start to understand that speaking about what works and what doesn't work . . . is OK.
that whole 'how dare you judge me' bit is beat because a lot of those 'how dare you judge me' ones are all together now in the by-and-by (they dead).
if I was standing in front of a porn store with a bible, then you might have a case to say 'don't be a jerk' to me.
but I'm anonymous and saying 'safe sex'.
so that's me being a moral scold?
but you reveal that your hyperbolic at the end so I suppose I could take it that way too.
you didn't read what I wrote. you give a meaningless picture.
I think your bot-script is broken.
this is an AI scold bot that failed. It thinks I'm on the other side of some imaginary argument and it posts a picture that is stupid and rather meaningless.
bot-scold fail.
when faced with an actual mind, the bot always fails.
notice that the guy never answers the question. He deflects it.
I answer later: no one would open that door.
but then my further post I go off into a bit for a while about how speaking about safey etc is OK and that there are other ages of moral ascendence gifted to those devoted to growth and love of others . . .
but none of that effects the gy. he shows a picture of a person with a balloon.
so that's it, it a person who is there to only draw it to the rediculous groinness of the shill mentality.
nothing exists for them above the neck.
this is a put on, right?
if it were true you wouln't need to jingoize it by (i) putting it in italics and (ii) repeating it.
fail.