>They've won that round
Yup
Going to be an interesting future where free and open discourse actually reigns supreme. I'm not sure anons have really explored this here, in discussion.
There are going to be scores of people living in scores of realities positing scores of viewpoints on anything/everything. It's going to take a while to get folks "on message" to seeking facts/truth only, for themselves, without relying on narratives.
The recent adrenochrome push, today, is proof of that. James Woods, though spot on, on a lot of things, is another that does things like this. Anons then come here and see if it's worth coordinating efforts. I think it's crucial for anons to remember the real purpose of what we're doing here is to seek truth, and disseminate it to the public. What happens from then on out, when people think/react on their own, is the result of independent thinking.
Question
What was Assange really looking for on the DoD networks?
Oh, I've been arguing Assange is black hat a majority of the time I've been here. I'm trying the other POV out to see if it fits. That's the problem with all this; it could go both ways.
Q has said that Mueller went after plants, and that means Page, Manafort, and possibly the others (Stone, Papadump) were all plants. The DNC filed suit against all these folks. That means the implicate Assange, DJT, his campaign, and the Russian Gov't. We know that's all bullshit, but the difficult part is trying to figure out who in the "Defendant" section of this complaint are good guys vs bad guys:
https://www.cohenmilsteinprocessserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DNC-COMPLAINT-STAMPED.pdf
Agreed.
Can you point to this? If Comey interfered in Assange extradition, that's big.