>>10584474

I'm not eliminating the idea of DEW… But… These fires are essentially blow torches. If they're wind driven or slope driven, there's not enough water in the world to stop them. Now picture a dude holding a flame thrower. He doesn't get burned but everything in front of him does… I've seen fire do gnarly things.

I've seen the pictures as well, but I always try to think of both sides of the coin. Natural or man-made… I'm more apt to believe it's bad people taking advantage of perfect fire conditions

>>10584654

I think it's the countless homeless starting warming fires that get out of control, combined with arsonists essentially being told by MSM that fire conditions are perfect, and potentially paid arsonists akin to Australia… Where I'm lost is the lightning complex fires in nor cal year after year